From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr>,
Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: nand: Check ONFI timings have been acked by the chip
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 16:13:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180105161321.44218e4e@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171222172853.27710-2-miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com>
On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 18:28:52 +0100
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Choosing ONFI timings when ->onfi_set/get_features() calls are supported
> by the NAND chip is a matter of reading the chip's ONFI parameter page
> and telling the chip the chosen mode (between all of the supported ones)
> with ->onfi_set_feature().
>
> Add a check on whether the chip "acked" the timing mode or not.
>
> This can be a problem for NAND chips that do not follow entirely the
> ONFI specification. These chips actually support other modes than
> "mode 0", but do not update the parameter page once a timing mode has
> been selected. This issue will be addressed in another patch that will
> add the feature to overwrite NAND chips features within the parameter
> page, from the NAND chip driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index 96c97588e1ba..ea862be6a803 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -1236,6 +1236,18 @@ static int nand_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int chipnr)
> tmode_param);
> if (ret)
> goto err;
> +
> + ret = chip->onfi_get_features(mtd, chip,
> + ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_TIMING_MODE,
> + tmode_param);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> + if (tmode_param[0] != chip->onfi_timing_mode_default) {
> + pr_warn("timings mode %d not acknowledged by the NAND chip\n",
> + chip->onfi_timing_mode_default);
> + goto err;
> + }
Hm, I'm not sure this is safe. The spec says that new ONFI timing mode
is applied as soon the CS line is released after a
SET_FEATURES(ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_TIMING_MODE), and since we have no
guarantee that the CS will be kept low by the controller after
->onfi_set_features() returns we must assume the new mode has been
applied and call ->setup_data_interface() to instruct the controller
to apply new timings.
If you want to check if the mode has really been applied, you should
release the CS (->select_chip(-1)), re-acquire it
(->select_chip(X)), and call
->onfi_get_features(ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_TIMING_MODE). If it appears that
the mode has not been applied, you should restore timing mode 0 and
issue a RESET.
> }
>
> ret = chip->setup_data_interface(mtd, chipnr, &chip->data_interface);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-05 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-22 17:28 [PATCH 0/2] Migrate the GPMI driver to use NAND core timings Miquel Raynal
2017-12-22 17:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] mtd: nand: Check ONFI timings have been acked by the chip Miquel Raynal
2018-01-05 15:13 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-01-05 15:42 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2018-01-08 13:04 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-01-15 13:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-01-15 17:57 ` Han Xu
2018-01-15 18:41 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-01-15 20:05 ` Miquel Raynal
2017-12-22 17:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] mtd: nand: gpmi: Support ->setup_data_interface() Miquel Raynal
2018-01-06 10:24 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180105161321.44218e4e@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=han.xu@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox