From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from imap.thunk.org ([2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:fe96:be03]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.89 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1eZsyQ-0007VW-I9 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 06:37:56 +0000 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 23:33:38 -0500 From: Theodore Ts'o To: Eric Biggers Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biggers Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] fscrypt: symlink helpers and fscrypt.h cleanup Message-ID: <20180112043338.GA8249@thunk.org> References: <20180105184502.48473-1-ebiggers3@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180105184502.48473-1-ebiggers3@gmail.com> List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I've taken the v2 version of this series, plus the ext4-specific patches to use the new symlink helpers (from the v1 patch series). After testing and validating them, I included the patches to convert f2fs and ubifs to use the symlink helpers, so I could also grab the cleanup patches from the V1 series. Jaeguk, Richard, please let me know if you are OK with my taking the f2fs and ubifs changes in the fscrypt tree. It seems like it would keep things simpler if we did that. Cheers, - Ted