From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"Brian Norris" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
"Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
"Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Cyrille Pitchen" <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
"Peter Pan" <peterpansjtu@gmail.com>,
"Frieder Schrempf" <frieder.schrempf@exceet.de>,
"Vignesh R" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"Yogesh Gaur" <yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com>,
"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
"Kamal Dasu" <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>,
"Sourav Poddar" <sourav.poddar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] spi: Extend the framework to generically support memory devices
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:51:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180219175140.7ec6f0e1@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180219162510.GG32761@sirena.org.uk>
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 16:25:10 +0000
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 12:21:14AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>
> > SPI NAND layer): you can register a SPI NOR device directly from the
> > dedicated SPI memory controller, or it can be registered through the
> > SPI layer if the SPI controller is a generic SPI controller. While
> > the generic SPI controller path works fine, the dedicated SPI NOR
> > controller path brings its own set of issues:
>
> > * the SPI bus is not represented in sysfs
>
> I'm not sure if this is a big deal or not - at some point it's just an
> implementation detail of the hardware rather than something we're aware
> of or interested in.
>
> > * because there's no bus, there's no uevent, which means you'll have to
> > select both the SPI NAND and SPI NOR logic as soon as one driver
> > supports both interfaces if you don't want to run into loading
> > dependency issues
>
> This is sounding like we want a class (well, virtual bus in the new
> world) for these devices with a SPI based driver sitting on top of that
> for use with genuine SPI controllers. If the intention is as the
> comments in the code suggested that controllers implementing the memory
> mapping stuff don't use SPI at all then we could have the legacy SPI bus
> support be just another driver for this class. However when I look at
> what the drivers are actually doing it seems like that's not the case
> and the new API is intended to sit alongside normal SPI support, perhaps
> only implementing certain operations and using regular SPI for others.
> In that case it makes a lot more sense to have this be bolted on the
> side of SPI.
This is a case: most controllers support both regular SPI transfers and
memory-like operations (with some optimizations for memory oriented
operations).
--
Boris Brezillon, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-19 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-05 23:21 [RFC PATCH 0/6] spi: Extend the framework to generically support memory devices Boris Brezillon
2018-02-05 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] spi: Extend the core to ease integration of SPI memory controllers Boris Brezillon
2018-02-06 9:43 ` Maxime Chevallier
2018-02-06 10:25 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-06 12:06 ` Mark Brown
2018-02-09 12:52 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-02-11 16:00 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-12 11:50 ` Vignesh R
2018-02-12 12:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-19 13:53 ` Mark Brown
2018-02-19 14:20 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-19 14:00 ` Mark Brown
2018-02-19 14:32 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-28 7:51 ` Peter Pan
2018-02-28 12:25 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-03-04 21:15 ` Cyrille Pitchen
2018-03-05 9:00 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-03-05 13:01 ` Cyrille Pitchen
2018-03-05 13:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-03-08 14:07 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-05 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] spi: bcm-qspi: Implement the spi_mem interface Boris Brezillon
2018-02-05 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] spi: bcm53xx: " Boris Brezillon
2018-02-05 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] spi: ti-qspi: " Boris Brezillon
2018-02-11 15:17 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-02-11 17:18 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-12 7:54 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-02-12 11:43 ` Vignesh R
2018-02-12 12:31 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-12 16:00 ` Vignesh R
2018-02-12 16:08 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-14 16:25 ` Vignesh R
2018-02-14 19:09 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-14 20:44 ` Schrempf Frieder
2018-02-14 21:00 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-15 16:38 ` Schrempf Frieder
2018-02-17 11:01 ` Vignesh R
2018-02-17 21:52 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-16 10:25 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-05 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] mtd: spi-nor: Use the spi_mem_xx() API Boris Brezillon
2018-02-12 11:44 ` Vignesh R
2018-02-12 12:32 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-06-11 6:25 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-06-11 7:35 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-05 23:21 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] spi: Get rid of the spi_flash_read() API Boris Brezillon
2018-02-16 10:21 ` Vignesh R
2018-02-16 10:24 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-19 16:25 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] spi: Extend the framework to generically support memory devices Mark Brown
2018-02-19 16:51 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-03-04 21:40 ` Cyrille Pitchen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180219175140.7ec6f0e1@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=frieder.schrempf@exceet.de \
--cc=kdasu.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=peterpansjtu@gmail.com \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sourav.poddar@ti.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox