linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Cc: miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com,
	boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, computersforpeace@gmail.com,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, marek.vasut@gmail.com,
	cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr, richard@nod.at,
	bpringlemeir@gmail.com, marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] mtd: nand: vf610_nfc: make use of ->exec_op()
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:13:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180222101338.18fd50be@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79473f4eb2e73ff4b68265e5f0278697@agner.ch>

On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:23:15 +0100
Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> wrote:

> On 21.02.2018 09:28, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:15:18 +0100
> > Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> wrote:
> >   
> >> >> +		}
> >> >> +
> >> >> +		row = ROW_ADDR(0, instr->ctx.addr.addrs[addr++]);
> >> >> +		code |= COMMAND_RAR_BYTE1;
> >> >> +		if (addr < instr->ctx.addr.naddrs) {
> >> >> +			row |= ROW_ADDR(1, instr->ctx.addr.addrs[addr++]);
> >> >> +			code |= COMMAND_RAR_BYTE2;
> >> >> +		}
> >> >> +		if (addr < instr->ctx.addr.naddrs) {
> >> >> +			row |= ROW_ADDR(2, instr->ctx.addr.addrs[addr++]);
> >> >> +			code |= COMMAND_RAR_BYTE3;
> >> >> +		}
> >> >> +
> >> >> +		dev_dbg(nfc->dev, "OP_ADDR: col %d, row %d\n", col, row);
> >> >> +
> >> >> +		instr = vf610_get_next_instr(subop, &op_id);
> >> >> +	}
> >> >> +
> >> >> +	if (instr && instr->type == NAND_OP_DATA_OUT_INSTR) {
> >> >> +		int len = nand_subop_get_data_len(subop, op_id);
> >> >> +		int offset = nand_subop_get_data_start_off(subop, op_id);
> >> >> +
> >> >> +		dev_dbg(nfc->dev, "OP_DATA_OUT: len %d, offset %d\n", len, offset);
> >> >> +
> >> >> +		vf610_nfc_memcpy(nfc->regs + NFC_MAIN_AREA(0) + offset,
> >> >> +				 instr->ctx.data.buf.in + offset,
> >> >> +				 len);  
> >> >
> >> > I think you have the same endianness problem you have for the READ
> >> > path. For example, I doubt SET_FEATURES will work properly if you're
> >> > in LE. So I repeat my initial suggestion: always do the byte swapping
> >> > when you're transfering data to/from the SRAM from vf610_nfc_cmd()
> >> > and use vf610_nfc_memcpy() only in the ->read/write_page()
> >> > implementations.
> >> >  
> >>
> >> Hm, but doesn't that leads to wrong order of data when using e.g. raw
> >> read/write page...?  
> > 
> > Yep you'll have to implement ->{read,write}_{page,oob}[_raw](), but I
> > prefer that to having an ->exec_op() implementation that tries to guess
> > what the core is trying to do.  
> 
> Have implemented those callbacks and the driver mounts UBI just fine.
> However, when trying to use the NAND tests this currently fails:
> 
> [   27.458447] =================================================
> [   27.464427] mtd_oobtest: MTD device: 3
> [   27.481006] mtd_oobtest: MTD device size 16777216, eraseblock size
> 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 128, pages per eraseblock
> 64, OOB size 64
> [   27.495154] mtd_test: scanning for bad eraseblocks
> [   27.500002] mtd_test: block 12 is bad
> [   27.505482] mtd_test: scanned 128 eraseblocks, 1 are bad
> [   27.510940] mtd_oobtest: test 1 of 5
> [   27.587528] mtd_oobtest: writing OOBs of whole device
> [   27.593113] mtd_oobtest: error: writeoob failed at 0x0
> [   27.598274] mtd_oobtest: error: use_len 2, use_offset 0
> [   27.605190] mtd_oobtest: error -5 occurred
> [   27.609320] =================================================
> insmod: ERROR: could not insert module mtd_oobtest.ko: Input/output
> error
> root@colibri-vf:~# insmod mtd_nandbiterrs.ko dev=3
> [   30.075103]
> [   30.076653] ==================================================
> [   30.082770] mtd_nandbiterrs: MTD device: 3
> [   30.100602] mtd_nandbiterrs: MTD device size 16777216,
> eraseblock=131072, page=2048, oob=64
> [   30.109019] mtd_nandbiterrs: Device uses 1 subpages of 2048 bytes
> [   30.115260] mtd_nandbiterrs: Using page=0, offset=0, eraseblock=0
> [   30.123679] mtd_nandbiterrs: incremental biterrors test
> [   30.129080] mtd_nandbiterrs: write_page
> [   30.134474] mtd_nandbiterrs: rewrite page
> [   30.138702] mtd_nandbiterrs: error: write_oob failed (-5)
> 
> 
> I did overwrite ->{read,write}_{page,oob}[_raw]() and set ->page_access
> in all of those, but still...
> 
> Do you have an idea what that could be? Otherwise will have to look
> closer what might cause this.

Look like your ->write_oob() method is returning -EIO, but I can't help
you without the code. Can you push it on a public git repo?


-- 
Boris Brezillon, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-22  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-08 23:59 [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] mtd: nand: vf610_nfc: make use of ->exec_op() Stefan Agner
2018-02-08 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] mtd: nand: vf610_nfc: remove unused function Stefan Agner
2018-02-12 21:32   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-08 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] mtd: nand: vf610_nfc: make use of ->exec_op() Stefan Agner
2018-02-09  8:20   ` Miquel Raynal
2018-02-09 12:41     ` Stefan Agner
2018-02-11 10:54   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-20 23:15     ` Stefan Agner
2018-02-20 23:34       ` Miquel Raynal
2018-02-21  7:18       ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-21  8:30         ` Stefan Agner
2018-02-21  9:03           ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-21  9:39             ` Stefan Agner
2018-02-21 10:09           ` Miquel Raynal
2018-02-21 12:32             ` Stefan Agner
2018-02-21  8:28       ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-21  8:35         ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-21 12:24           ` Stefan Agner
2018-02-21 12:46             ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-21 21:18               ` Stefan Agner
2018-02-21 23:23         ` Stefan Agner
2018-02-22  9:13           ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-02-08 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] mtd: nand: vf610_nfc: remove old hooks Stefan Agner
2018-02-11 10:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] mtd: nand: vf610_nfc: make use of ->exec_op() Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180222101338.18fd50be@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=bpringlemeir@gmail.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=stefan@agner.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).