public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Charles-Antoine Couret <charles-antoine.couret@essensium.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtdcore: add writeable attribute in sysfs
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 21:43:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180420214327.25b8ac15@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180412134232.14006-1-charles-antoine.couret@essensium.com>

Hi Charles-Antoine,

On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 15:42:32 +0200
Charles-Antoine Couret <charles-antoine.couret@essensium.com> wrote:

> MTD devices read-write or read-only property could be set by the bootloader with
> the mtdparts argument but there is no way to change this definition at runtime
> on Linux. The flags can be read but can not be changed.
> 
> This patch adds the possibility to force a MTD device to be read-only or read-write
> even if the bootloader requested something else. The purpose is to offer to
> the user of a device to eventually change something that is not allowed
> like updating the bootloader or change its environement.

Hm, why don't you remove the RO constraint on such partitions then? I
mean, if the device can be written, even rarely, it's no longer a
read-only device.

> 
> Or to protect the device without using mtdro virtual device to read the content.

What's the point? Only root can access /dev/mtdX. Looks like you want
to protect against inadvertent write to the wrong MTD dev, but I'm not
sure this is the kernel responsibility to enforce that.

Missing Signed-off-by tag.

> ---
>  drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> index 807d17d863b3..3a9a7055ee53 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,39 @@ static ssize_t mtd_flags_show(struct device *dev,
>  }
>  static DEVICE_ATTR(flags, S_IRUGO, mtd_flags_show, NULL);
>  
> +static ssize_t mtd_writeable_show(struct device *dev,
> +		struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)

Please align parameters on the open-parenthesis.

> +{
> +	struct mtd_info *mtd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	unsigned int writeable = mtd->flags & MTD_WRITEABLE ? 1 : 0;
> +
> +	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", writeable);
> +
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t mtd_writeable_store(struct device *dev,
> +					   struct device_attribute *attr,
> +					   const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +	struct mtd_info *mtd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	unsigned int writeable;
> +	int retval;
> +
> +
> +	retval = kstrtouint(buf, 0, &writeable);
> +	if (retval)
> +		return retval;
> +
> +	if (writeable)
> +		mtd->flags |= MTD_WRITEABLE;
> +	else
> +		mtd->flags &= ~MTD_WRITEABLE;

What happens if you turn a RW device into a RO while it's still being
used by someone? Not sure at all this is safe.

Regards,

Boris

> +
> +	return count;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(writeable, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, mtd_writeable_show,
> +	mtd_writeable_store);
> +
>  static ssize_t mtd_size_show(struct device *dev,
>  		struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>  {
> @@ -322,6 +355,7 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(bbt_blocks, S_IRUGO, mtd_bbtblocks_show, NULL);
>  static struct attribute *mtd_attrs[] = {
>  	&dev_attr_type.attr,
>  	&dev_attr_flags.attr,
> +	&dev_attr_writeable.attr,
>  	&dev_attr_size.attr,
>  	&dev_attr_erasesize.attr,
>  	&dev_attr_writesize.attr,

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-20 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-12 13:42 [PATCH] mtdcore: add writeable attribute in sysfs Charles-Antoine Couret
2018-04-20 19:43 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-04-23  9:54   ` Couret Charles-Antoine

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180420214327.25b8ac15@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
    --cc=charles-antoine.couret@essensium.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox