From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: Steve deRosier <derosier@gmail.com>,
Tobi Wulff <Tobi.Wulff@alliedtelesis.co.nz>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: NAND timeout issues with blank chip and Marvell NFC
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:21:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180426082154.24eff30c@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180426080642.7fc9b8ba@bbrezillon>
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:06:42 +0200
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 05:16:57 +0000
> Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > ret = marvell_nfc_wait_op(chip,
> > > chip->data_interface.timings.sdr.tPROG_max);
> > >
> > > Based on the datasheet that number is 600 microseconds(us) not the
> > > milliseconds expected by marvell_nfc_wait_op().
> > >
> >
> > So naturally throwing in some PSEC_TO_MSEC() calls stopped the really
> > long timeouts but then the probe would fail. It seems that I'm getting
> > some "page done" and "command done" interrupts indications (NDSR =
> > 0x0000500) while attempting to write the oob data.
> >
> > I've also re-done some of my initial tests and it seems that 4.17-rc2
> > cannot mount this chip. The 4.16.4 kernel can.
>
> Hm, I suspect 07ad5a721484 ("mtd: nand: add ->setup_data_interface()
> support for Marvell NFCv1") to be the source of our problems.
>
> Can you add the 'marvell,nand-keep-config' property to your nand node?
> Looks like we'll need another way to extract the NFC version in case
> old bindings are in use (maybe by parsing the compatible of the root
> node).
Forget what I said, it seems you're already using nand-armada370 which
maps to NFCv2.
I guess a git bisect would be useful here to find what causes the
regression.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-26 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-24 5:31 NAND timeout issues with blank chip and Marvell NFC Chris Packham
2018-04-24 15:49 ` Steve deRosier
2018-04-24 16:08 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-04-25 21:22 ` Chris Packham
2018-04-26 1:40 ` Chris Packham
2018-04-26 5:16 ` Chris Packham
2018-04-26 6:06 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-04-26 6:21 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-04-26 7:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-04-26 22:43 ` Chris Packham
2018-04-27 4:30 ` Chris Packham
2018-04-27 6:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-05-02 15:28 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-05-02 22:12 ` Chris Packham
2018-04-25 21:16 ` Chris Packham
2018-04-25 13:32 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180426082154.24eff30c@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=Tobi.Wulff@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=derosier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox