From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fBkfe-0007Df-Dd for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:27:04 +0000 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 19:26:48 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Miquel Raynal Cc: Richard Weinberger , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Marek Vasut , Sylvain Lemieux , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Vladimir Zapolskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/11] mtd: rawnand: lpc32xx_slc: clean the probe function Message-ID: <20180426192648.4df1ad55@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20180421180043.18366-11-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> References: <20180421180043.18366-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20180421180043.18366-11-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 20:00:42 +0200 Miquel Raynal wrote: > Before fixing the error path of the probe function, fix the style of the > entire function and particularly the goto labels: they should indicate > what the next cleanup to do is. > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/lpc32xx_slc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/lpc32xx_slc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/lpc32xx_slc.c > index 5f7cc6da0a7f..342f666ad435 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/lpc32xx_slc.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/lpc32xx_slc.c > @@ -831,11 +831,11 @@ static int lpc32xx_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (IS_ERR(host->clk)) { > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Clock failure\n"); > res = -ENOENT; > - goto err_exit1; > + goto release_gpio; > } > res = clk_prepare_enable(host->clk); > if (res) > - goto err_exit1; > + goto release_gpio; > > /* Set NAND IO addresses and command/ready functions */ > chip->IO_ADDR_R = SLC_DATA(host->io_base); > @@ -874,19 +874,19 @@ static int lpc32xx_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > GFP_KERNEL); > if (host->data_buf == NULL) { > res = -ENOMEM; > - goto err_exit2; > + goto release_clk; > } > > res = lpc32xx_nand_dma_setup(host); > if (res) { > res = -EIO; > - goto err_exit2; > + goto release_clk; > } > > /* Find NAND device */ > res = nand_scan_ident(mtd, 1, NULL); > if (res) > - goto err_exit3; > + goto release_dma; > > /* OOB and ECC CPU and DMA work areas */ > host->ecc_buf = (uint32_t *)(host->data_buf + LPC32XX_DMA_DATA_SIZE); > @@ -920,21 +920,23 @@ static int lpc32xx_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > */ > res = nand_scan_tail(mtd); > if (res) > - goto err_exit3; > + goto release_dma; > > mtd->name = "nxp_lpc3220_slc"; > res = mtd_device_register(mtd, host->ncfg->parts, > host->ncfg->num_parts); > - if (!res) > - return res; > + if (res) > + goto release_nand; > > + return 0; > + > +release_nand: > nand_release(mtd); > - > -err_exit3: > +release_dma: > dma_release_channel(host->dma_chan); > -err_exit2: > +release_clk: You mean unprepare_clk. > clk_disable_unprepare(host->clk); > -err_exit1: > +release_gpio: And I'd go for enable_wp here since it's not releasing the gpio at all. No need to resend, I'll fix it when applying > lpc32xx_wp_enable(host); > > return res;