linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 1/2] spi-nor: intel-spi: Fix atomic sequence handling
@ 2018-02-05 11:32 Mika Westerberg
  2018-02-05 11:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] spi-nor: intel-spi: Explicitly mark the driver as dangerous in Kconfig Mika Westerberg
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mika Westerberg @ 2018-02-05 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mtd
  Cc: Cyrille Pitchen, Marek Vasut, David Woodhouse, Brian Norris,
	Boris Brezillon, Richard Weinberger, Anthony Wong, Bin Meng,
	Mika Westerberg

On many older systems using SW sequencer the PREOP_OPTYPE register
contains two preopcodes as following:

  PREOP_OPTYPE=0xf2785006

The last two bytes are the opcodes decoded to:

  0x50 - Write enable for volatile status register
  0x06 - Write enable

The former is used to modify volatile bits in the status register. For
non-volatile bits the latter is needed. Preopcodes are used in SW
sequencer to send one command "atomically" without anything else
interfering the transfer. The sequence that gets executed is:

  - Send preopcode (write enable) from PREOP_OPTYPE register
  - Send the actual SPI command
  - Poll busy bit in the status register (0x05, RDSR)

Commit 8c473dd61bb5 ("spi-nor: intel-spi: Don't assume OPMENU0/1 to be
programmed by BIOS") enabled atomic sequence handling but because both
preopcodes are programmed, the following happens:

  if (preop >> 8)
  	val |= SSFSTS_CTL_SPOP;

Since on these systems preop >> 8 == 0x50 we end up picking volatile
write enable instead. Because of this the actual write command is pretty
much NOP unless there is a WREN latched in the chip already.

Furthermore we should not really just assume that WREN was issued in
previous call to intel_spi_write_reg() because that might not be the
case.

This updates driver to first check that the opcode is actually available
in PREOP_OPTYPE register and if not return error back to the spi-nor
core (if the controller is not locked we program it now). In addition we
save the opcode to ispi->atomic_preopcode field which is checked in next
call to intel_spi_sw_cycle() to actually enable atomic sequence using
the requested preopcode.

Fixes: 8c473dd61bb5 ("spi-nor: intel-spi: Don't assume OPMENU0/1 to be programmed by BIOS")
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
Changes from v1:

  - Added atomic_preopcode field and only when it is set, enable atomic
    sequence.
  - Return -EINVAL if the requested WREN operation cannot be found from
    PREOP register instead of silently pretending it is supported.
  - Updated patch subject to match more closely what is being fixed.

 drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c
index 699951523179..8e98f4ab87c1 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c
@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@
  * @swseq_reg: Use SW sequencer in register reads/writes
  * @swseq_erase: Use SW sequencer in erase operation
  * @erase_64k: 64k erase supported
+ * @atomic_preopcode: Holds preopcode when atomic sequence is requested
  * @opcodes: Opcodes which are supported. This are programmed by BIOS
  *           before it locks down the controller.
  */
@@ -153,6 +154,7 @@ struct intel_spi {
 	bool swseq_reg;
 	bool swseq_erase;
 	bool erase_64k;
+	u8 atomic_preopcode;
 	u8 opcodes[8];
 };
 
@@ -474,7 +476,7 @@ static int intel_spi_sw_cycle(struct intel_spi *ispi, u8 opcode, int len,
 			      int optype)
 {
 	u32 val = 0, status;
-	u16 preop;
+	u8 atomic_preopcode;
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = intel_spi_opcode_index(ispi, opcode, optype);
@@ -484,17 +486,42 @@ static int intel_spi_sw_cycle(struct intel_spi *ispi, u8 opcode, int len,
 	if (len > INTEL_SPI_FIFO_SZ)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/*
+	 * Always clear it after each SW sequencer operation regardless
+	 * of whether it is successful or not.
+	 */
+	atomic_preopcode = ispi->atomic_preopcode;
+	ispi->atomic_preopcode = 0;
+
 	/* Only mark 'Data Cycle' bit when there is data to be transferred */
 	if (len > 0)
 		val = ((len - 1) << SSFSTS_CTL_DBC_SHIFT) | SSFSTS_CTL_DS;
 	val |= ret << SSFSTS_CTL_COP_SHIFT;
 	val |= SSFSTS_CTL_FCERR | SSFSTS_CTL_FDONE;
 	val |= SSFSTS_CTL_SCGO;
-	preop = readw(ispi->sregs + PREOP_OPTYPE);
-	if (preop) {
-		val |= SSFSTS_CTL_ACS;
-		if (preop >> 8)
-			val |= SSFSTS_CTL_SPOP;
+	if (atomic_preopcode) {
+		u16 preop;
+
+		switch (optype) {
+		case OPTYPE_WRITE_NO_ADDR:
+		case OPTYPE_WRITE_WITH_ADDR:
+			/* Pick matching preopcode for the atomic sequence */
+			preop = readw(ispi->sregs + PREOP_OPTYPE);
+			if ((preop & 0xff) == atomic_preopcode)
+				; /* Do nothing */
+			else if ((preop >> 8) == atomic_preopcode)
+				val |= SSFSTS_CTL_SPOP;
+			else
+				return -EINVAL;
+
+			/* Enable atomic sequence */
+			val |= SSFSTS_CTL_ACS;
+			break;
+
+		default:
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
 	}
 	writel(val, ispi->sregs + SSFSTS_CTL);
 
@@ -538,13 +565,31 @@ static int intel_spi_write_reg(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 opcode, u8 *buf, int len)
 
 	/*
 	 * This is handled with atomic operation and preop code in Intel
-	 * controller so skip it here now. If the controller is not locked,
-	 * program the opcode to the PREOP register for later use.
+	 * controller so we only verify that it is available. If the
+	 * controller is not locked, program the opcode to the PREOP
+	 * register for later use.
+	 *
+	 * When hardware sequencer is used there is no need to program
+	 * any opcodes (it handles them automatically as part of a command).
 	 */
 	if (opcode == SPINOR_OP_WREN) {
-		if (!ispi->locked)
+		u16 preop;
+
+		if (!ispi->swseq_reg)
+			return 0;
+
+		preop = readw(ispi->sregs + PREOP_OPTYPE);
+		if ((preop & 0xff) != opcode && (preop >> 8) != opcode) {
+			if (ispi->locked)
+				return -EINVAL;
 			writel(opcode, ispi->sregs + PREOP_OPTYPE);
+		}
 
+		/*
+		 * This enables atomic sequence on next SW sycle. Will
+		 * be cleared after next operation.
+		 */
+		ispi->atomic_preopcode = opcode;
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -569,6 +614,13 @@ static ssize_t intel_spi_read(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t from, size_t len,
 	u32 val, status;
 	ssize_t ret;
 
+	/*
+	 * Atomic sequence is not expected with HW sequencer reads. Make
+	 * sure it is cleared regardless.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ispi->atomic_preopcode))
+		ispi->atomic_preopcode = 0;
+
 	switch (nor->read_opcode) {
 	case SPINOR_OP_READ:
 	case SPINOR_OP_READ_FAST:
@@ -627,6 +679,9 @@ static ssize_t intel_spi_write(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t to, size_t len,
 	u32 val, status;
 	ssize_t ret;
 
+	/* Not needed with HW sequencer write, make sure it is cleared */
+	ispi->atomic_preopcode = 0;
+
 	while (len > 0) {
 		block_size = min_t(size_t, len, INTEL_SPI_FIFO_SZ);
 
@@ -707,6 +762,9 @@ static int intel_spi_erase(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t offs)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+	/* Not needed with HW sequencer erase, make sure it is cleared */
+	ispi->atomic_preopcode = 0;
+
 	while (len > 0) {
 		writel(offs, ispi->base + FADDR);
 
-- 
2.15.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-18 20:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-02-05 11:32 [PATCH v2 1/2] spi-nor: intel-spi: Fix atomic sequence handling Mika Westerberg
2018-02-05 11:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] spi-nor: intel-spi: Explicitly mark the driver as dangerous in Kconfig Mika Westerberg
2018-02-27 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] spi-nor: intel-spi: Fix atomic sequence handling Mika Westerberg
2018-04-03 13:48   ` Mika Westerberg
2018-04-04  8:21     ` Marek Vasut
2018-04-04 19:22       ` Boris Brezillon
2018-05-18  5:20         ` Mika Westerberg
2018-05-18  6:53           ` Boris Brezillon
2018-05-18 20:01 ` Boris Brezillon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).