public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@infinera.com>
Cc: "linux-mtd @ lists . infradead . org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Avoid point less unlocking/locking
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 17:14:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180605171443.29365913@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180605140710.8624-2-joakim.tjernlund@infinera.com>

On Tue,  5 Jun 2018 16:07:10 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@infinera.com> wrote:

> cfi_ppb_unlock() walks all flash chips when unlocking sectors.
> This is a waste when crossing chip boundaris unaffected

				      ^ boundaries.

> by the unlock operation.

AFAICT there are 2 unrelated changes in this commit:
1/ Fix the boundary check which is broken if the unlock operation
   crosses a chip boundary (adr is reset to 0 when that happens).
2/ Avoid unlocking chips that are outside the requested unlock range.

#1 is a fix, #2 is not. You should split that in 2 different commits,
and tag #1 with Fixes and Cc-stable.

> 
> Fixes: 1648eaaa1575e
> Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@infinera.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
> index c74c53b886be..ee8b70e54298 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
> @@ -2669,7 +2669,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused cfi_ppb_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs,
>  		 * sectors shall be unlocked, so lets keep their locking
>  		 * status at "unlocked" (locked=0) for the final re-locking.
>  		 */
> -		if ((adr < ofs) || (adr >= (ofs + len))) {
> +		if ((offset < ofs) || (offset >= (ofs + len))) {
>  			sect[sectors].chip = &cfi->chips[chipnum];
>  			sect[sectors].adr = adr;
>  			sect[sectors].locked = do_ppb_xxlock(
> @@ -2685,6 +2685,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused cfi_ppb_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs,
>  			i++;
>  
>  		if (adr >> cfi->chipshift) {
> +			if (offset >= (ofs + len))
> +				break;
>  			adr = 0;
>  			chipnum++;
>  			if (chipnum >= cfi->numchips)

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-05 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-05 14:07 [PATCH 1/2] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: fix SEGV unlocking multiple chips Joakim Tjernlund
2018-06-05 14:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Avoid point less unlocking/locking Joakim Tjernlund
2018-06-05 15:14   ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-06-05 16:57     ` Joakim Tjernlund
2018-06-06 10:15       ` Joakim Tjernlund
2018-06-19 17:23         ` Joakim Tjernlund
2018-06-05 15:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: fix SEGV unlocking multiple chips Boris Brezillon
2018-06-05 15:26 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-06-05 15:33   ` Joakim Tjernlund
2018-06-06 10:13   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Use right chip in do_ppb_xxlock() Joakim Tjernlund
2018-06-06 10:13     ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: fix SEGV unlocking multiple chips Joakim Tjernlund
2018-06-20  9:06       ` Boris Brezillon
2018-06-06 10:13     ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Avoid point less unlocking/locking Joakim Tjernlund
2018-06-20  9:14       ` Boris Brezillon
2018-06-20 11:10         ` Joakim Tjernlund
2018-06-20 11:54           ` Boris Brezillon
2018-06-06 10:13     ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Avoid walking all chips when unlocking Joakim Tjernlund
2018-06-20  9:25       ` Boris Brezillon
2018-06-20 11:10         ` Joakim Tjernlund
2018-06-20 12:19           ` Boris Brezillon
2018-06-20 15:07             ` Joakim Tjernlund
2018-06-20  9:03     ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Use right chip in do_ppb_xxlock() Boris Brezillon
2018-06-20 11:10       ` Joakim Tjernlund
2018-06-22 11:35     ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180605171443.29365913@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
    --cc=joakim.tjernlund@infinera.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox