From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fV9j3-0005ZB-Sb for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 06:02:48 +0000 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 08:02:24 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Chris Packham Cc: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger , Marek Vasut Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] mtd: rawnand: micron: add fixup for ONFI revision Message-ID: <20180619080224.3bc1efa3@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20180619053125.16792-4-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> References: <20180619053125.16792-1-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> <20180619053125.16792-4-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 17:31:22 +1200 Chris Packham wrote: > Some Micron NAND chips (MT29F1G08ABAFAWP-ITE:F) report 00 00 for the > revision number field of the ONFI parameter page. Rather than rejecting > these outright assume ONFI version 1.0 if the revision number is 00 00. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Packham > --- > This is now qualified on vendor == MICRON. I haven't qualified this > based on specific chips the ABAFA (id=d1) and ABBFA (id=a1) variants are > documented to have this behaviour. > > Changes in v2: > - use fixup_onfi_param_page > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c > index 0af45b134c0c..e582c9e61715 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c > @@ -287,6 +287,14 @@ static int micron_nand_init(struct nand_chip *chip) > return 0; > } > > +static void micron_fixup_onfi_param_page(struct nand_chip *chip, > + struct nand_onfi_params *p) > +{ Could you add a comment repeating what you have in your commit message here? With this addressed Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon > + if (le16_to_cpu(p->revision) == 0) > + p->revision = cpu_to_le16(1 << 1); > +} > + > const struct nand_manufacturer_ops micron_nand_manuf_ops = { > .init = micron_nand_init, > + .fixup_onfi_param_page = micron_fixup_onfi_param_page, > };