From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fVZ1h-0001Mu-Fv for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 09:03:47 +0000 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:03:15 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Joakim Tjernlund Cc: "linux-mtd @ lists . infradead . org" , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Use right chip in do_ppb_xxlock() Message-ID: <20180620110315.2af69cfe@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20180606101330.11071-1-joakim.tjernlund@infinera.com> References: <20180605172607.50acb34f@bbrezillon> <20180606101330.11071-1-joakim.tjernlund@infinera.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 12:13:27 +0200 Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > do_ppb_xxlock() fails to add chip->start when > quering for lock status(and chip_ready test), ^ querying? > which caused false status reports. The 3 above lines are wrapped at less than 50 chars, is this normal? > Fix by adding adr += chip->start and adjust call sites accordingly. > > Fixes: 1648eaaa1575 ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Support Persistent Protection Bits (PPB) locking") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund > --- > > v2 - Spilt into several patches > > drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c | 9 +++++---- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c > index 53a976a8e614..8648b1adccd5 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c > @@ -2554,8 +2554,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused do_ppb_xxlock(struct map_info *map, > unsigned long timeo; > int ret; > > + adr += chip->start; > mutex_lock(&chip->mutex); > - ret = get_chip(map, chip, adr + chip->start, FL_LOCKING); > + ret = get_chip(map, chip, adr, FL_LOCKING); > if (ret) { > mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex); > return ret; > @@ -2573,8 +2574,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused do_ppb_xxlock(struct map_info *map, > > if (thunk == DO_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_LOCK) { > chip->state = FL_LOCKING; > - map_write(map, CMD(0xA0), chip->start + adr); > - map_write(map, CMD(0x00), chip->start + adr); > + map_write(map, CMD(0xA0), adr); > + map_write(map, CMD(0x00), adr); > } else if (thunk == DO_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_UNLOCK) { > /* > * Unlocking of one specific sector is not supported, so we > @@ -2612,7 +2613,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused do_ppb_xxlock(struct map_info *map, > map_write(map, CMD(0x00), chip->start); > > chip->state = FL_READY; > - put_chip(map, chip, adr + chip->start); > + put_chip(map, chip, adr); > mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex); > > return ret;