From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: add default values for dynamic timings
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:26:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180717142621.380adf1e@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180714102354.12323-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 12:23:54 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> Some timings like tBERS (block erase time), tCCs (change column setup
> time), tPROG (page program time) and tR (page read time) are derived
> from the ONFI parameter page. They are set in the SDR interface only
> if the chip is ONFI compliant.
>
> It makes these timings unreliable and prevent the driver to use one of
> these four values with a non-ONFI chip.
>
> Fix this situation by taking the highest possible value (or a default
> one) value for each missing timing (stored as unsigned 16-bit entries in
> the parameter page).
>
> This makes tBERS and tPROG being ~65ms while typical values are at most
> a few milliseconds. As these are timeouts, it is not impacting at all
> the performances in nominal use.
>
> tR maximum time and tCCS minimum time (delay to wait after a change
> column) are set, according to the ONFI specification, to default 'slow'
> values; respectively 200us and 500ns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1
> ================
> * Remove in the commit message a wrong assertion on which the problem
> depicted above happened when no ->setup_data_inferface() hook was set.
> * The missing timings were set, for each timing mode, in the
> onfi_sdr_timings structure, not it is done in an else block in
> onfi_fill_data_interface() once.
> * Changed tR and tCCS to be 'timing mode 0' values by default (should
> limit the impact of such a change in throughputs).
>
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_timings.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_timings.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_timings.c
> index 7c4e4a371bbc..9bb599106a31 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_timings.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_timings.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
>
> +#define ONFI_DYN_TIMING_MAX U16_MAX
> +
> static const struct nand_data_interface onfi_sdr_timings[] = {
> /* Mode 0 */
> {
> @@ -303,7 +305,7 @@ int onfi_fill_data_interface(struct nand_chip *chip,
>
> /*
> * Initialize timings that cannot be deduced from timing mode:
> - * tR, tPROG, tCCS, ...
> + * tPROG, tBERS, tR and tCCS.
> * These information are part of the ONFI parameter page.
> */
> if (chip->parameters.onfi.version) {
> @@ -317,6 +319,22 @@ int onfi_fill_data_interface(struct nand_chip *chip,
>
> /* nanoseconds -> picoseconds */
> timings->tCCS_min = 1000UL * params->onfi.tCCS;
> + } else {
> + struct nand_sdr_timings *timings = &iface->timings.sdr;
> + /*
> + * For non-ONFI chips we use the highest possible value for
> + * tPROG and tBERS. tR and tCCS will take the default values
> + * precised in the ONFI specification for timing mode 0,
> + * respectively 200us and 500ns.
> + */
> +
> + /* microseconds -> picoseconds */
> + timings->tPROG_max = 1000000ULL * ONFI_DYN_TIMING_MAX;
> + timings->tBERS_max = 1000000ULL * ONFI_DYN_TIMING_MAX;
> + timings->tR_max = 1000000ULL * 200000000ULL;
> +
> + /* nanoseconds -> picoseconds */
> + timings->tCCS_min = 1000UL * 500000;
> }
>
> return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-17 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-14 10:23 [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: add default values for dynamic timings Miquel Raynal
2018-07-17 12:26 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-07-18 7:46 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180717142621.380adf1e@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).