From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fftnc-0005Z9-Jg for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 21:15:54 +0000 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:15:26 +0200 From: Miquel Raynal To: Abhishek Sahu Cc: Boris Brezillon , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Marek Vasut , Richard Weinberger , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Andy Gross Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update BBT related flags Message-ID: <20180718231526.38046099@xps13> In-Reply-To: <1530863519-5564-5-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> References: <1530863519-5564-1-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> <1530863519-5564-5-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Abhishek, Abhishek Sahu wrote on Fri, 6 Jul 2018 13:21:58 +0530: > Remove the NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN to use RAM based BBT. Unless I am understanding it the wrong way, NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN will skip the scan of the on-chip BBT and will scan every block to construct a RAM, based BBT thanks to the BBM. So flash based BBT is already unused and removing this flag is a mistake, right? > Flash based BBT is not used since bootloaders > doesn't have support for the same. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu > --- Thanks, Miqu=C3=A8l