From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: rawnand: add hooks that may be called during nand_scan()
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:42:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180719004225.438ea90f@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180718215056.1242-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:50:56 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> In order to remove the limitation that forbids dynamic allocation in
> nand_scan_ident(), we must create a path that will be the same for all
> controller drivers. The idea is to use nand_scan() instead of the widely
> used nand_scan_ident()/nand_scan_tail() couple. In order to achieve
> this, controller drivers will need to adjust some parameters between
> these two functions depending on the NAND chip wired on them.
>
> For that, a hook called ->attach_chip() is created as part of the
> nand_controller_ops structure, itself embedded in the nand_controller
> structure. The later may be referenced by two ways:
> 1/ if the driver does not implement its own controller, the
> chip->controller hook is not populated before nand_scan() so it
> cannot be dereferenced: use chip->dummy_controller instead (which is
> statically allocated and will be referenced later by chip->controller
> anyway).
> 2/ through chip->controller if the driver implements its own controller.
>
> Another hook, ->detach_chip() is also introduced in order to clean the
> controller driver's potential allocations in case of failure of
> nand_scan_tail(). There is no need for the controller driver to call the
> ->detach_chip() hook directly upon error after a successful nand_scan().
> In this situation, calling nand_release() as before is enough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> index 0aef0299f4f2..a64a344bf7a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> @@ -6697,6 +6697,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_scan_tail);
> is_module_text_address((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0))
> #endif
>
> +static int nand_attach(struct nand_chip *chip)
> +{
> + if (chip->controller->ops && chip->controller->ops->attach_chip)
> + return chip->controller->ops->attach_chip(chip);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void nand_detach(struct nand_chip *chip)
> +{
> + if (chip->controller->ops && chip->controller->ops->detach_chip)
> + chip->controller->ops->detach_chip(chip);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * nand_scan_with_ids - [NAND Interface] Scan for the NAND device
> * @mtd: MTD device structure
> @@ -6710,11 +6724,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_scan_tail);
> int nand_scan_with_ids(struct mtd_info *mtd, int maxchips,
> struct nand_flash_dev *ids)
> {
> + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> int ret;
>
> ret = nand_scan_ident(mtd, maxchips, ids);
> - if (!ret)
> - ret = nand_scan_tail(mtd);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = nand_attach(chip);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = nand_scan_tail(mtd);
> + if (ret)
> + nand_detach(chip);
> +
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_scan_with_ids);
> @@ -6742,7 +6766,11 @@ void nand_cleanup(struct nand_chip *chip)
>
> /* Free manufacturer priv data. */
> nand_manufacturer_cleanup(chip);
> +
> + /* Free controller specific allocations after chip identification */
> + nand_detach(chip);
> }
> +
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_cleanup);
>
> /**
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
> index eb5a053fd06b..d046b3a61205 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
> @@ -509,6 +509,19 @@ struct nand_id {
> int len;
> };
>
> +/**
> + * struct nand_controller_ops - Controller operations
> + *
> + * @attach_chip: Callback that may be called between nand_detect() and
> + * nand_scan_tail() during nand_scan() (optional).
> + * @detach_chip: Callback that may be called if nand_scan_tail() fails
> + * (optional).
> + */
> +struct nand_controller_ops {
> + int (*attach_chip)(struct nand_chip *chip);
> + void (*detach_chip)(struct nand_chip *chip);
> +};
> +
> /**
> * struct nand_controller - Control structure for hardware controller
> * shared among independent devices
> @@ -517,11 +530,13 @@ struct nand_id {
> * @wq: wait queue to sleep on if a NAND operation is in
> * progress used instead of the per chip wait queue
> * when a hw controller is available.
> + * @ops: NAND controller operations.
> */
> struct nand_controller {
> spinlock_t lock;
> struct nand_chip *active;
> wait_queue_head_t wq;
> + const struct nand_controller_ops *ops;
> };
>
> static inline void nand_controller_init(struct nand_controller *nfc)
> @@ -529,6 +544,7 @@ static inline void nand_controller_init(struct nand_controller *nfc)
> nfc->active = NULL;
> spin_lock_init(&nfc->lock);
> init_waitqueue_head(&nfc->wq);
> + nfc->ops = NULL;
Hm, actually it does not work for all dummy controllers since this
function is called from nand_set_defaults() which is called from
nand_scan_ident(). That means the previous chip->dummy_controller.ops
assignment you might have done before calling nand_scan() is gone.
Looks like we'll have to patch all drivers to call
nand_controller_init(&chip->dummy_controller), unless you see a better
option.
> }
>
> /**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-18 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-18 21:50 [PATCH v2 0/2] Changes in the internal raw NAND API Miquel Raynal
2018-07-18 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: rawnand: better name for the controller structure Miquel Raynal
2018-07-18 21:58 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-18 22:02 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-07-18 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: rawnand: add hooks that may be called during nand_scan() Miquel Raynal
2018-07-18 22:26 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-18 22:42 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-07-18 22:46 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-18 22:56 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-07-18 22:55 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180719004225.438ea90f@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).