linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC PATCH] mtd: nand: toshiba: Add support for ->exec_op()
@ 2018-07-19  7:53 KOBAYASHI Yoshitake
  2018-07-19  8:24 ` Boris Brezillon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: KOBAYASHI Yoshitake @ 2018-07-19  7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: boris.brezillon, miquel.raynal, richard, dwmw2, computersforpeace,
	marek.vasut
  Cc: linux-mtd, linux-kernel, KOBAYASHI Yoshitake

This patch is a patch to support TOSHIBA MEMORY CORPORATION BENAND
memory devices.  This use vendor specific command
(TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS) to know the exact bitflips.  However, I
could not test this patch because I do not have a platform that
supports chip-> exec_op.  Therefore, I post this patch as RFC.

As soon as I get a platform that supports chip-> exec_op, I would like
to test and re-post.

Signed-off-by: KOBAYASHI Yoshitake <yoshitake.kobayashi@toshiba.co.jp>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
index 6cec923..12218cd 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
@@ -17,28 +17,74 @@
 
 #include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
 
+/* ECC Status Read Command for BENAND */
+#define TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS_READ	0x7A
+
+/* ECC Status Mask for BENAND */
+#define TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_MASK	0x0F
+
 /* Recommended to rewrite for BENAND */
 #define TOSHIBA_NAND_STATUS_REWRITE_RECOMMENDED	BIT(3)
 
+static int toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op(struct nand_chip *chip,
+						 u8 *buf)
+{
+	u8 *ecc_status = buf;
+
+	const struct nand_sdr_timings *sdr =
+		nand_get_sdr_timings(&chip->data_interface);
+	struct nand_op_instr instrs[] = {
+		NAND_OP_CMD(TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS_READ,
+			    PSEC_TO_NSEC(sdr->tADL_min)),
+		NAND_OP_8BIT_DATA_IN(chip->ecc.steps, ecc_status, 0),
+	};
+	struct nand_operation op = NAND_OPERATION(instrs);
+
+	/* Drop the DATA_IN instruction if chip->ecc.steps is set to 0. */
+	if (!chip->ecc.steps)
+		op.ninstrs--;
+
+	return nand_exec_op(chip, &op);
+}
+
 static int toshiba_nand_benand_eccstatus(struct mtd_info *mtd,
 					 struct nand_chip *chip)
 {
-	int ret;
+	int ret, i;
 	unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
-	u8 status;
-
-	/* Check Status */
-	ret = nand_status_op(chip, &status);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
-	if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) {
-		/* uncorrected */
-		mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
-	} else if (status & TOSHIBA_NAND_STATUS_REWRITE_RECOMMENDED) {
-		/* corrected */
-		max_bitflips = mtd->bitflip_threshold;
-		mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += max_bitflips;
+	u8 status, bitflips, ecc_status[8];
+
+	if (chip->exec_op) {
+		/* Check ECC Status */
+		ret = toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op(chip, ecc_status);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+
+		for (i = 0; i < chip->ecc.steps; i++) {
+			bitflips = (ecc_status[i] &
+				    TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_MASK);
+			if (bitflips == 0x0F) {
+				mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
+			} else {
+				mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += bitflips;
+				max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int,
+						     max_bitflips, bitflips);
+			}
+		}
+	} else {
+		/* Check Status */
+		ret = nand_status_op(chip, &status);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+
+		if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) {
+			/* uncorrected */
+			mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
+		} else if (status & TOSHIBA_NAND_STATUS_REWRITE_RECOMMENDED) {
+			/* corrected */
+			max_bitflips = mtd->bitflip_threshold;
+			mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += max_bitflips;
+		}
 	}
 
 	return max_bitflips;
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: nand: toshiba: Add support for ->exec_op()
  2018-07-19  7:53 [RFC PATCH] mtd: nand: toshiba: Add support for ->exec_op() KOBAYASHI Yoshitake
@ 2018-07-19  8:24 ` Boris Brezillon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2018-07-19  8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: KOBAYASHI Yoshitake
  Cc: miquel.raynal, richard, dwmw2, computersforpeace, marek.vasut,
	linux-mtd, linux-kernel

On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:53:47 +0900
KOBAYASHI Yoshitake <yoshitake.kobayashi@toshiba.co.jp> wrote:

> This patch is a patch to support TOSHIBA MEMORY CORPORATION BENAND
> memory devices.  This use vendor specific command
> (TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS) to know the exact bitflips.  However, I
> could not test this patch because I do not have a platform that
> supports chip-> exec_op.  Therefore, I post this patch as RFC.
> 
> As soon as I get a platform that supports chip-> exec_op, I would like
> to test and re-post.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOBAYASHI Yoshitake <yoshitake.kobayashi@toshiba.co.jp>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c | 76
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 61
> insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c index 6cec923..12218cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
> @@ -17,28 +17,74 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
>  
> +/* ECC Status Read Command for BENAND */
> +#define TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS_READ	0x7A
> +
> +/* ECC Status Mask for BENAND */
> +#define TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_MASK	0x0F
> +
>  /* Recommended to rewrite for BENAND */
>  #define TOSHIBA_NAND_STATUS_REWRITE_RECOMMENDED	BIT(3)
>  
> +static int toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op(struct nand_chip
> *chip,
> +						 u8 *buf)
> +{
> +	u8 *ecc_status = buf;
> +

How about letting this function return -ENOTSUPP when ->exec_op() is
not implemented?

	if (!chip->exec_op)
		return -ENOTSUPP;

> +	const struct nand_sdr_timings *sdr =
> +		nand_get_sdr_timings(&chip->data_interface);
> +	struct nand_op_instr instrs[] = {
> +		NAND_OP_CMD(TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS_READ,
> +			    PSEC_TO_NSEC(sdr->tADL_min)),
> +		NAND_OP_8BIT_DATA_IN(chip->ecc.steps, ecc_status, 0),
> +	};
> +	struct nand_operation op = NAND_OPERATION(instrs);
> +
> +	/* Drop the DATA_IN instruction if chip->ecc.steps is set to
> 0. */
> +	if (!chip->ecc.steps)

Can this really happen? I hope not.

> +		op.ninstrs--;
> +
> +	return nand_exec_op(chip, &op);
> +}
> +
>  static int toshiba_nand_benand_eccstatus(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>  					 struct nand_chip *chip)
>  {
> -	int ret;
> +	int ret, i;
>  	unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
> -	u8 status;
> -
> -	/* Check Status */
> -	ret = nand_status_op(chip, &status);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) {
> -		/* uncorrected */
> -		mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> -	} else if (status & TOSHIBA_NAND_STATUS_REWRITE_RECOMMENDED)
> {
> -		/* corrected */
> -		max_bitflips = mtd->bitflip_threshold;
> -		mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += max_bitflips;
> +	u8 status, bitflips, ecc_status[8];
> +
> +	if (chip->exec_op) {
> +		/* Check ECC Status */
> +		ret = toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op(chip,
> ecc_status);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < chip->ecc.steps; i++) {
> +			bitflips = (ecc_status[i] &
> +				    TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_MASK);

Unneeded parens.

> +			if (bitflips == 0x0F) {

Please define a macro for the UNCORRECTABLE (0xf) value.

> +				mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> +			} else {
> +				mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += bitflips;
> +				max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int,
> +						     max_bitflips,
> bitflips);

Declare bitflips as an unsigned int, so that you can use max() instead
of max_t().

> +			}
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		/* Check Status */
> +		ret = nand_status_op(chip, &status);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) {
> +			/* uncorrected */
> +			mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> +		} else if (status &
> TOSHIBA_NAND_STATUS_REWRITE_RECOMMENDED) {
> +			/* corrected */
> +			max_bitflips = mtd->bitflip_threshold;
> +			mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += max_bitflips;
> +		}
>  	}

If you go for the "toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op() returns
-ENOTSUPP solution", you could replace the above section by:

	ret = toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op(chip, ecc_status);
	if (!ret) {
		u8 ecc_status[8];
		unsigned int i;

		for (i = 0; i < chip->ecc.steps; i++) {
			bitflips = ecc_status[i] & TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_MASK;
			if (bitflips == TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_UNCORR) {
				mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
			} else {
				mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += bitflips;
				max_bitflips = max(max_bitflips,bitflips);
			}
		}

		return max_bitflips;
	}

	/*
	 * Fallback to regular status check if
	 * toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op() failed.
	 */
	ret = nand_status_op(chip, &status);
	if (ret)
		return ret;

	if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) {
		/* uncorrected */
		mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
	} else if (status & TOSHIBA_NAND_STATUS_REWRITE_RECOMMENDED) {
		/* corrected */
		max_bitflips = mtd->bitflip_threshold;
		mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += max_bitflips;
	}
 
 	return max_bitflips;
}

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-07-19  8:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-07-19  7:53 [RFC PATCH] mtd: nand: toshiba: Add support for ->exec_op() KOBAYASHI Yoshitake
2018-07-19  8:24 ` Boris Brezillon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).