From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: adapt misleading comment in mtd_oob_ops structure
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 23:16:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180719231600.1bff62a5@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180718203302.5666-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 22:33:02 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> A comment in the kernel doc of the mtd_oob_ops structure tells that it
> is not possible to write more than one page with OOB. This is actually
> true for only a few MTD devices like 'onenand' but it is definitely not
> a general limitation. While this would benefit to be handled elsewhere
> either by the MTD layer or by the limited drivers, let's update this
> comment to reflect the reality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Applied.
Thanks,
Boris
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
> =================
> * Boris pointed out that this comment was not entirely false but rather
> too much restrictive compared to the reality and proposed an
> alternative that I simply copied there.
>
>
> include/linux/mtd/mtd.h | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> index a86c4fa93115..cd0be91bdefa 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> @@ -67,9 +67,11 @@ struct mtd_erase_region_info {
> * @datbuf: data buffer - if NULL only oob data are read/written
> * @oobbuf: oob data buffer
> *
> - * Note, it is allowed to read more than one OOB area at one go, but not write.
> - * The interface assumes that the OOB write requests program only one page's
> - * OOB area.
> + * Note, some MTD drivers do not allow you to write more than one OOB area at
> + * one go. If you try to do that on such an MTD device, -EINVAL will be
> + * returned. If you want to make your implementation portable on all kind of MTD
> + * devices you should split the write request into several sub-requests when the
> + * request crosses a page boundary.
> */
> struct mtd_oob_ops {
> unsigned int mode;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-19 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-18 20:33 [PATCH v2] mtd: adapt misleading comment in mtd_oob_ops structure Miquel Raynal
2018-07-19 21:16 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180719231600.1bff62a5@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox