From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fy1ZS-0007az-N0 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 21:12:12 +0000 Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 23:11:48 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Bernhard Frauendienst Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Virtual MTD concat device driver Message-ID: <20180906231148.7f707304@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20180906161413.6335-1-kernel@nospam.obeliks.de> References: <20180906161413.6335-1-kernel@nospam.obeliks.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 18:14:10 +0200 Bernhard Frauendienst wrote: > Hi everybody, > > when porting my router board from a mach-file based OpenWRT target to a > device-tree based target, I found that there is no generic way to create > a mtd_concat device from within the dts. The following patches attempt > to provide that possibility. May I ask what kind of devices you're trying to concatenate? Are they of the same type? And finally, I'd like to understand the use case.