From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]) by casper.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1g1uYw-0001Xh-9G for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 14:31:43 +0000 From: Boris Brezillon To: David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Boris Brezillon , Marek Vasut , Richard Weinberger , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Cc: Jarkko Nikula , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2] mtd: devices: m25p80: Make sure the buffer passed in op is DMA-able Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 16:31:30 +0200 Message-Id: <20180917143130.23007-1-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , As documented in spi-mem.h, spi_mem_op->data.buf.{in,out} must be DMA-able, and commit 4120f8d158ef ("mtd: spi-nor: Use the spi_mem_xx() API") failed to follow this rule as buffers passed to ->{read,write}_reg() are usually placed on the stack. Fix that by allocating a scratch buffer and copying the data around. Fixes: 4120f8d158ef ("mtd: spi-nor: Use the spi_mem_xx() API") Reported-by: Jarkko Nikula Cc: Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon --- Note that the ->{read,write}() path is still buggy since nothing guarantees that buffers passed by the MTD layer to the SPI NOR layer are DMA-able, but this is a long-standing issue which we'll have to address at the spi-nor level (this layer can choose the bounce buffer size based on nor->page_size). Changes in v2: - Copy the data from scratchbuf in the ->read_reg() path --- drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c index cbfafc453274..270d3c9580c5 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c @@ -39,13 +39,23 @@ static int m25p80_read_reg(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 code, u8 *val, int len) struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(code, 1), SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR, SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY, - SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, val, 1)); + SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, NULL, 1)); + void *scratchbuf; int ret; + scratchbuf = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!scratchbuf) + return -ENOMEM; + + op.data.buf.in = scratchbuf; ret = spi_mem_exec_op(flash->spimem, &op); if (ret < 0) dev_err(&flash->spimem->spi->dev, "error %d reading %x\n", ret, code); + else + memcpy(val, scratchbuf, len); + + kfree(scratchbuf); return ret; } @@ -56,9 +66,19 @@ static int m25p80_write_reg(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 opcode, u8 *buf, int len) struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(opcode, 1), SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR, SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY, - SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(len, buf, 1)); + SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(len, NULL, 1)); + void *scratchbuf; + int ret; - return spi_mem_exec_op(flash->spimem, &op); + scratchbuf = kmemdup(buf, len, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!scratchbuf) + return -ENOMEM; + + op.data.buf.out = scratchbuf; + ret = spi_mem_exec_op(flash->spimem, &op); + kfree(scratchbuf); + + return ret; } static ssize_t m25p80_write(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t to, size_t len, -- 2.14.1