From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1g1uQK-0005lG-MV for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 14:22:50 +0000 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 16:22:37 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Jarkko Nikula Cc: David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Marek Vasut , Richard Weinberger , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: devices: m25p80: Make the buffer passed in op is DMA-able Message-ID: <20180917162237.49e6889f@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <239bb1a4-c986-0f5e-61b9-a08f54947bfe@linux.intel.com> References: <20180917133652.12442-1-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> <239bb1a4-c986-0f5e-61b9-a08f54947bfe@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:13:32 +0300 Jarkko Nikula wrote: > On 09/17/2018 04:36 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > As documented in spi-mem.h, spi_mem_op->data.buf.{in,out} must be > > DMA-able, and commit 4120f8d158ef ("mtd: spi-nor: Use the spi_mem_xx() > > API") failed to follow this rule as buffers passed to > > ->{read,write}_reg() are usually placed on the stack. > > > > Fix that by allocating a scratch buffer and copying the data in there > > before passing it to the spi-mem layer. > > > > Fixes: 4120f8d158ef ("mtd: spi-nor: Use the spi_mem_xx() API") > > Reported-by: Jarkko Nikula > > Cc: > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > > --- > > Note that the ->{read,write}() path is still buggy since nothing > > guarantees that buffers passed by the MTD layer to the SPI NOR layer > > are DMA-able, but this is a long-standing issue which we'll have to > > address at the spi-nor level (this layer can choose the bounce buffer > > size based on nor->page_size). > > --- > > drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c > > index cbfafc453274..3b7fafa4bbd6 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c > > @@ -39,14 +39,22 @@ static int m25p80_read_reg(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 code, u8 *val, int len) > > struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(code, 1), > > SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR, > > SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY, > > - SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, val, 1)); > > + SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, NULL, 1)); > > + void *scratchbuf; > > int ret; > > > > + scratchbuf = kmemdup(val, len, GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!scratchbuf) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + op.data.buf.in = scratchbuf; > > ret = spi_mem_exec_op(flash->spimem, &op); > > if (ret < 0) > > dev_err(&flash->spimem->spi->dev, "error %d reading %x\n", ret, > > code); > > > > + kfree(scratchbuf); > > + > > Actually this makes things even worse: "unrecognized JEDEC id bytes: b1, > 74, 01" since we don't copy scratchbuf to original buffer and kmemdup > before bus read is needless :-) True :-). I'll fix that and send a v2.