public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: Allow selection of ECC byte ordering at runtime
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 13:30:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180923133019.1c6c9cbc@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180904142328.26577-1-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>

Hi Boris,

Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> wrote on Tue,  4 Sep 2018
16:23:28 +0200:

> Currently, the selection of ECC byte ordering for software hamming is
> done at compilation time, which doesn't make sense when ECC byte
> calculation is done in hardware and byte ordering is forced by the
> hardware engine.
> In this case, only the correction is done and software and we want to

                                            ^ in

> force the byte-ordering no matter the value of CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SMC.
> 
> This is typically the case for the FSMC (Smart Media ordering), TMIO and
> TXX9NDFMC (regular byte ordering) blocks.
> 
> For all other use cases (pure software implementation, SM FTL and
> nandecctest), we keep selecting the byte ordering based on the
> CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SMC value. It might not be ideal for SM FTL (I'd
> expect Smart Media ordering to be employed by the Smart Media FTL), but
> this option doesn't seem to be enabled in the existing _defconfig, so
> I can't tell setting sm_order to true is the right choice.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
> ---

Applied to nand/next with the above typo corrected.

Thanks,
Miquèl

      reply	other threads:[~2018-09-23 11:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-04 14:23 [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: Allow selection of ECC byte ordering at runtime Boris Brezillon
2018-09-23 11:30 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180923133019.1c6c9cbc@xps13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox