From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:17:38 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur Cc: Cyrille Pitchen , Tudor Ambarus , "marek.vasut@gmail.com" , "dwmw2@infradead.org" , "computersforpeace@gmail.com" , "richard@nod.at" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nicolas.ferre@microchip.com" , "cyrille.pitchen@microchip.com" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "Cristian.Birsan@microchip.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI NOR flash memories Message-ID: <20181017091738.2619dd06@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20181017091045.124e0266@bbrezillon> References: <20180911154007.17195-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> <20180911154007.17195-2-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> <31a8f6a9-1459-443a-6ef8-2b2c17769ae4@microchip.com> <20181017090724.12f2cd79@bbrezillon> <20181017091045.124e0266@bbrezillon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:10:45 +0200 Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:07:24 +0200 > Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 02:07:43 +0000 > > Yogesh Narayan Gaur wrote: > > > > > > > > > Actually there is no entry of s25fs512s in current spi-nor.c file. > > > For my connected flash part, jedec ID read points to s25fl512s. I > > > have asked my board team to confirm the name of exact connected flash > > > part. When I check the data sheet of s25fs512s, it also points to the > > > same Jedec ID information. { "s25fl512s", INFO(0x010220, 0x4d00, 256 > > > * 1024, 256, ....} > > > > > > But as stated earlier, if I skip reading SFDP or read using 1-1-1 > > > protocol then read are always correct. For 1-4-4 protocol read are > > > wrong and on further debugging found that Read code of 0x6C is being > > > send as opcode instead of 0xEC. > > > > > > If I revert this patch, reads are working fine. > > > > Can you try with the following patch? > > > > Hm, nevermind. The problem is actually not related to 4B vs non-4B mode > but 1-1-4 vs 1-4-4 modes. > Can you add traces in this loop [1] to see which features are flagged as supported and which ones are not. [1]https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.19-rc8/source/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c#L2259