From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ot1-f66.google.com ([209.85.210.66]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gFkzl-0003CO-VN for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 19:08:40 +0000 Received: by mail-ot1-f66.google.com with SMTP id u26so9065524otk.13 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:08:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 14:08:25 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Linus Walleij Cc: David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Boris BREZILLON , Mark Vasut , Richard Weinberger , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mtd: partitions: Add RedBoot FIS DT bindings Message-ID: <20181025190825.GA15870@bogus> References: <20181019070622.26661-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20181019070622.26661-2-linus.walleij@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 09:27:24AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > Hi, > > now just to forestall possible predictable bikeshedding on the devicetree > list before it happens: > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 9:06 AM Linus Walleij wrote: > > > +RedBoot FLASH Image System (FIS) Partitions > > This expansion of the acronym including using capital letters in > FLASH comes from the eCOS source code for RedBoot: > https://sourceware.org/viewvc/ecos/packages/redboot/current/src/flash.c?view=markup > > > +- compatible : (required) must be "redboot-fis" > > There is no vendor here because the source code was owned by > Cygnus Solutions, Redhat and now Free Software Foundation. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECos > > We have no (AFAICT) policy for whether stuff that just change vendor > all the time should be named after the inventing (first) company "cygnus,*", > current owner "fsf,*" or the one that made most changes to the source > code "redhat,*". I do not think we should care, and just name it > "redboot-fis" for it's historical value and widespread acceptance so this > is a conscious naming scheme. > > If one of the OF maintainers says they want it a certain way I will change > it without discussion, I just want this supported. It's all fine for me. I was only going to comment is Redboot still a thing? :) Rob