From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gKhJb-0008QJ-CQ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:13:32 +0000 Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 11:13:00 +0100 From: Boris Brezillon To: Kuninori Morimoto Cc: Miquel Raynal , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Marek Vasut , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: sh_flctl: convert to SPDX identifiers Message-ID: <20181108111300.1f9d4457@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20181108095728.6c19b8f0@bbrezillon> References: <87muqkytbv.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <20181108095728.6c19b8f0@bbrezillon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 09:57:28 +0100 Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 06:39:20 +0000 > Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > > From: Kuninori Morimoto > > > > This patch updates license to use SPDX-License-Identifier > > instead of verbose license text. > > > > As original license mentioned, it is GPL-2.0 in SPDX. > > Then, MODULE_LICENSE() should be "GPL v2" instead of "GPL". > > See ${LINUX}/include/linux/module.h > > > > "GPL" [GNU Public License v2 or later] > > "GPL v2" [GNU Public License v2] > > I had a similar case recently and I based my SPDX tag on the > MODULE_LICENSE() value instead of the license header. > Is this "license header" > MODULE_LICENSE() rule documented > somewhere? Looks like you made the right choice [1]. I'll fix my patches to follow this rule. [1]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rtc/20180625015832.GB30408@kroah.com/