From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gP8q9-0003ZV-U6 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 16:25:30 +0000 Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:24:43 +0100 From: Boris Brezillon To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli Cc: , , , , , , nagasuresh12@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v12 3/3] mtd: rawnand: arasan: Add support for Arasan NAND Flash Controller Message-ID: <20181120172443.5fb0bc14@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <1541739641-17789-4-git-send-email-naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com> References: <1541739641-17789-1-git-send-email-naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com> <1541739641-17789-4-git-send-email-naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:30:41 +0530 Naga Sureshkumar Relli wrote: > +static int anfc_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int csline, > + const struct nand_data_interface *conf) > +{ > + struct anfc_nand_controller *nfc = to_anfc(chip->controller); > + struct anfc_nand_chip *achip = to_anfc_nand(chip); > + int err; > + const struct nand_sdr_timings *sdr; > + u32 inftimeval; > + bool change_sdr_clk = false; > + > + if (csline == NAND_DATA_IFACE_CHECK_ONLY) > + return 0; > + > + /* > + * If the controller is already in the same mode as flash device > + * then no need to change the timing mode again. > + */ > + sdr = nand_get_sdr_timings(conf); > + if (IS_ERR(sdr)) > + return PTR_ERR(sdr); > + > + if (sdr->mode < 0) > + return -ENOTSUPP; > + > + inftimeval = sdr->mode & 7; > + if (sdr->mode >= 2 && sdr->mode <= 5) > + change_sdr_clk = true; > + /* > + * SDR timing modes 2-5 will not work for the arasan nand when > + * freq > 90 MHz, so reduce the freq in SDR modes 2-5 to < 90Mhz What's the freq for mode 0 and 1? > + */ > + if (change_sdr_clk) { > + clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->clk_sys); > + err = clk_set_rate(nfc->clk_sys, SDR_MODE_DEFLT_FREQ); You should not change the clk rate here. It should be done when the chip is selected, so that, if you ever have 2 different chips connected to the same controller, you can adapt the rate when they are accessed. > + if (err) { > + dev_err(nfc->dev, "Can't set the clock rate\n"); > + return err; > + } > + err = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->clk_sys); > + if (err) { > + dev_err(nfc->dev, "Unable to enable sys clock.\n"); > + clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->clk_sys); > + return err; > + } > + } > + achip->inftimeval = inftimeval; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int anfc_nand_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip) > +{ > + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip); > + struct anfc_nand_chip *achip = to_anfc_nand(chip); > + u32 ret; > + > + if (mtd->writesize <= SZ_512) > + achip->spare_caddr_cycles = 1; > + else > + achip->spare_caddr_cycles = 2; > + > + chip->ecc.calc_buf = kmalloc(mtd->oobsize, GFP_KERNEL); > + chip->ecc.code_buf = kmalloc(mtd->oobsize, GFP_KERNEL); Those bufs are allocated but never freed (memleak). Also, are you sure you really need them.