From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gQ8iE-0007nj-Sh for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 10:29:28 +0000 Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 11:29:03 +0100 From: Boris Brezillon To: "Sverdlin, Alexander (Nokia - DE/Ulm)" Cc: "Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com" , "marek.vasut@gmail.com" , "dwmw2@infradead.org" , "computersforpeace@gmail.com" , "richard@nod.at" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: fix erase_type array to indicate current map conf Message-ID: <20181123112903.56393f28@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20181123111729.1d5b6e57@bbrezillon> References: <20181122123552.15756-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> <3d8a2b83-282d-7cb2-3c8b-addae3c2af7f@nokia.com> <20181123111729.1d5b6e57@bbrezillon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 11:17:29 +0100 Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:42:55 +0000 > "Sverdlin, Alexander (Nokia - DE/Ulm)" > wrote: > > > Hello Tudor, > > > > On 22/11/2018 13:36, Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com wrote: > > > From: Tudor Ambarus > > > > > > Bug reported for the out-of-tree S25FS128S flash memory. > > > > > > BFPT table advertises all the erase types supported by all the > > > possible map configurations. Update the erase_type array to indicate > > > which erase types are applicable to the current map configuration. > > > > > > Backward compatibility test done on sst26vf064b. > > > > > > Fixes: b038e8e3be72 ("mtd: spi-nor: parse SFDP Sector Map Parameter Table") > > > Reported-by: Alexander Sverdlin > > > Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus > > > > I've tested this patch and it fixes the erasesize for S25FS128S and > > our 128k partitions are writeable again with this patch. > > > > Nevertheless, I think this is coincidence. I don't think that it > > makes sense to OR all the erase types from all regions in one > > bitmask and derive any uniform erasesize out of it. > > This makes little sense for me in case of non-uniform maps. > > > > I believe, the culprit here is one level higher, in the MTD partitioning > > code (mtdpart.c) which has to be taught about non-uniform maps > > but there is no infrastructure for this currently. > > Keep in mind that mtdpart is only one part of the issue. As I said > previously, some MTD users (UBI) expect a single eraseblock size, so > it's not only mtdpart that you'd need to fix, but basically all MTD > users that don't check ->eraseregions. Just checked, and it seems mtdpart already supports eraseregions [1]. It picks the biggest erasesize of the regions covered by the partition, which is exactly what we want. So all we'd have to do is make spi-nor.c define those regions. [1]https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.20-rc3/source/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c#L482