From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gSqa9-0000kq-FP for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 21:44:18 +0000 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:44:05 -0800 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: James Bottomley Cc: Davidlohr Bueso , Kees Cook , LKML , Amir Goldstein , Andrew Morton , Andy Shevchenko , Daniel Axtens , "David S. Miller" , Dominik Brodowski , Maling list - DRI developers , Eric Dumazet , federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it, Geert Uytterhoeven , Helge Deller , Jonathan Corbet , Joshua Kinard , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Linux Media Mailing List , Linux MIPS Mailing List , Linux mtd , linux-parisc , Linux PM list , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, Network Development , nouveau , Paolo Abeni , Paul Burton , Petr Mladek , Rob Herring , sean.wang@mediatek.com, Sergey Senozhatsky , shannon.nelson@oracle.com, Stefano Brivio , Steven Rostedt , "Tobin C. Harding" , makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp, Willem de Bruijn , Yonghong Song , yanjun.zhu@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3 Message-ID: <20181130214405.GG23772@linux.intel.com> References: <20181130192737.15053-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20181130195652.7syqys76646kpaph@linux-r8p5> <20181130205521.GA21006@linux.intel.com> <1543611662.3031.20.camel@HansenPartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1543611662.3031.20.camel@HansenPartnership.com> List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:01:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > No because use of what some people consider to be bad language isn't > necessarily abusive, offensive or degrading. Our most heavily censored > medium is TV and "fuck" is now considered acceptable in certain > contexts on most channels in the UK and EU. This makes following the CoC extremely hard to a non-native speaker as it is not too explicit on what is OK and what is not. I did through the whole thing with an eye glass and this what I deduced from it. /Jarkko