From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"Brian Norris" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
"Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
"Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mtd: improve calculating partition boundaries when checking for alignment
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 08:53:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181203085349.0cc85117@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181120092409.13864-1-zajec5@gmail.com>
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:24:09 +0100
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>
> When checking for alignment mtd should check absolute offsets. It's
> important for subpartitions as it doesn't make sense to check their
> relative addresses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Queued to mtd/next.
> ---
> V2: Switch from uint64_t to u64. I got incorrectly inspired by
> uint64_t offset;
> ---
> drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> index 2b6e53af47da..b6af41b04622 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,15 @@ static inline struct mtd_part *mtd_to_part(const struct mtd_info *mtd)
> return container_of(mtd, struct mtd_part, mtd);
> }
>
> +static u64 part_absolute_offset(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> +{
> + struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> +
> + if (!mtd_is_partition(mtd))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return part_absolute_offset(part->parent) + part->offset;
> +}
>
> /*
> * MTD methods which simply translate the effective address and pass through
> @@ -514,7 +523,7 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partition(struct mtd_info *parent,
> if (!(slave->mtd.flags & MTD_NO_ERASE))
> wr_alignment = slave->mtd.erasesize;
>
> - tmp = slave->offset;
> + tmp = part_absolute_offset(parent) + slave->offset;
> remainder = do_div(tmp, wr_alignment);
> if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) && remainder) {
> /* Doesn't start on a boundary of major erase size */
> @@ -525,7 +534,7 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partition(struct mtd_info *parent,
> part->name);
> }
>
> - tmp = slave->mtd.size;
> + tmp = part_absolute_offset(parent) + slave->mtd.size;
> remainder = do_div(tmp, wr_alignment);
> if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) && remainder) {
> slave->mtd.flags &= ~MTD_WRITEABLE;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-03 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-20 8:56 [PATCH] mtd: improve calculating partition boundaries when checking for alignment Rafał Miłecki
2018-11-20 9:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-11-20 9:24 ` [PATCH V2] " Rafał Miłecki
2018-12-03 7:53 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181203085349.0cc85117@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox