From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gWzcc-0008OH-87 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 08:12:01 +0000 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:11:35 +0100 From: Miquel Raynal To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli Cc: Boris Brezillon , "robh@kernel.org" , "richard@nod.at" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "marek.vasut@gmail.com" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "nagasuresh12@gmail.com" , Michal Simek , "computersforpeace@gmail.com" , "dwmw2@infradead.org" Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v12 3/3] mtd: rawnand: arasan: Add support for Arasan NAND Flash Controller Message-ID: <20181212091135.1d0cc9a6@xps13> In-Reply-To: References: <1541739641-17789-1-git-send-email-naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com> <1541739641-17789-4-git-send-email-naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com> <20181118204324.373ca9cc@bbrezillon> <20181119090246.49060019@bbrezillon> <20181120120244.7d2442b5@bbrezillon> <20181120133624.3fa4742d@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Naga, Naga Sureshkumar Relli wrote on Wed, 12 Dec 2018 05:27:03 +0000: > Hi Boris & Miquel, >=20 > An update to my comments on thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/15/656. > In this I said, will take a default error count value as 16 and during pa= ge read, will check the error count > Register value with this and if it is equal to or greater than the defaul= t count(16) then I am checking for > Erased pages. > But bit[7:0] in ECC_Error_Count_Register(0x38) will update for each error= occurred. > Link: https://www.xilinx.com/html_docs/registers/ug1087/ug1087-zynq-ultra= scale-registers.html and > check for NAND module, ECC_Error_Count_Register. >=20 > I mean previously I dependent on Total error count value (bit[16:8]), but= we can simply check for bit[7:0] > To see the error occurred or not.=20 > I tried with this approach and I don't see any issues with that. > I ran ubifs with this and I am able to see the bit[7:0] count is updated = for erased page read and then will > Use nand_chech_erased_ecc_chunk() to see the bitflips. >=20 > If it is ok, I will update the driver and will send new patch, but do you= have any other comments on v12? Is 'nandbiterrs -i' running correctly now? Thanks, Miqu=C3=A8l