From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Use a consistent name for sunxi_nand_chip objects
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 09:18:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181215091856.4f10b60f@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181215081214.4935-1-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Oops, I'm missing a few patches in this series. Please ignore this
version.
On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 09:12:10 +0100
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> wrote:
> sunxi_nand_chip objects are sometimes called chip and other times
> called sunxi_nand. Make that consistent and name all occurrences
> sunxi_nand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
> index a5c83cbe4897..9139fc003b1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
> @@ -1471,8 +1471,8 @@ static int _sunxi_nand_lookup_timing(const s32 *lut, int lut_size, u32 duration,
> static int sunxi_nfc_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *nand, int csline,
> const struct nand_data_interface *conf)
> {
> - struct sunxi_nand_chip *chip = to_sunxi_nand(nand);
> - struct sunxi_nfc *nfc = to_sunxi_nfc(chip->nand.controller);
> + struct sunxi_nand_chip *sunxi_nand = to_sunxi_nand(nand);
> + struct sunxi_nfc *nfc = to_sunxi_nfc(sunxi_nand->nand.controller);
> const struct nand_sdr_timings *timings;
> u32 min_clk_period = 0;
> s32 tWB, tADL, tWHR, tRHW, tCAD;
> @@ -1591,7 +1591,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *nand, int csline,
> tCAD = 0x7;
>
> /* TODO: A83 has some more bits for CDQSS, CS, CLHZ, CCS, WC */
> - chip->timing_cfg = NFC_TIMING_CFG(tWB, tADL, tWHR, tRHW, tCAD);
> + sunxi_nand->timing_cfg = NFC_TIMING_CFG(tWB, tADL, tWHR, tRHW, tCAD);
>
> /* Convert min_clk_period from picoseconds to nanoseconds */
> min_clk_period = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_clk_period, 1000);
> @@ -1602,10 +1602,11 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *nand, int csline,
> * This new formula was verified with a scope and validated by
> * Allwinner engineers.
> */
> - chip->clk_rate = NSEC_PER_SEC / min_clk_period;
> - real_clk_rate = clk_round_rate(nfc->mod_clk, chip->clk_rate);
> + sunxi_nand->clk_rate = NSEC_PER_SEC / min_clk_period;
> + real_clk_rate = clk_round_rate(nfc->mod_clk, sunxi_nand->clk_rate);
> if (real_clk_rate <= 0) {
> - dev_err(nfc->dev, "Unable to round clk %lu\n", chip->clk_rate);
> + dev_err(nfc->dev, "Unable to round clk %lu\n",
> + sunxi_nand->clk_rate);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -1615,8 +1616,8 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *nand, int csline,
> * 30 ns.
> */
> min_clk_period = NSEC_PER_SEC / real_clk_rate;
> - chip->timing_ctl = ((min_clk_period * 2) < 30) ?
> - NFC_TIMING_CTL_EDO : 0;
> + sunxi_nand->timing_ctl = ((min_clk_period * 2) < 30) ?
> + NFC_TIMING_CTL_EDO : 0;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1853,7 +1854,7 @@ static const struct nand_controller_ops sunxi_nand_controller_ops = {
> static int sunxi_nand_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct sunxi_nfc *nfc,
> struct device_node *np)
> {
> - struct sunxi_nand_chip *chip;
> + struct sunxi_nand_chip *sunxi_nand;
> struct mtd_info *mtd;
> struct nand_chip *nand;
> int nsels;
> @@ -1870,17 +1871,17 @@ static int sunxi_nand_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct sunxi_nfc *nfc,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - chip = devm_kzalloc(dev,
> - sizeof(*chip) +
> - (nsels * sizeof(struct sunxi_nand_chip_sel)),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!chip) {
> + sunxi_nand = devm_kzalloc(dev,
> + sizeof(*sunxi_nand) +
> + (nsels * sizeof(struct sunxi_nand_chip_sel)),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!sunxi_nand) {
> dev_err(dev, "could not allocate chip\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - chip->nsels = nsels;
> - chip->selected = -1;
> + sunxi_nand->nsels = nsels;
> + sunxi_nand->selected = -1;
>
> for (i = 0; i < nsels; i++) {
> ret = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "reg", i, &tmp);
> @@ -1902,16 +1903,16 @@ static int sunxi_nand_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct sunxi_nfc *nfc,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - chip->sels[i].cs = tmp;
> + sunxi_nand->sels[i].cs = tmp;
>
> if (!of_property_read_u32_index(np, "allwinner,rb", i, &tmp) &&
> tmp < 2)
> - chip->sels[i].rb = tmp;
> + sunxi_nand->sels[i].rb = tmp;
> else
> - chip->sels[i].rb = -1;
> + sunxi_nand->sels[i].rb = -1;
> }
>
> - nand = &chip->nand;
> + nand = &sunxi_nand->nand;
> /* Default tR value specified in the ONFI spec (chapter 4.15.1) */
> nand->legacy.chip_delay = 200;
> nand->controller = &nfc->controller;
> @@ -1943,7 +1944,7 @@ static int sunxi_nand_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct sunxi_nfc *nfc,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - list_add_tail(&chip->node, &nfc->chips);
> + list_add_tail(&sunxi_nand->node, &nfc->chips);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1973,14 +1974,15 @@ static int sunxi_nand_chips_init(struct device *dev, struct sunxi_nfc *nfc)
>
> static void sunxi_nand_chips_cleanup(struct sunxi_nfc *nfc)
> {
> - struct sunxi_nand_chip *chip;
> + struct sunxi_nand_chip *sunxi_nand;
>
> while (!list_empty(&nfc->chips)) {
> - chip = list_first_entry(&nfc->chips, struct sunxi_nand_chip,
> - node);
> - nand_release(&chip->nand);
> - sunxi_nand_ecc_cleanup(&chip->nand.ecc);
> - list_del(&chip->node);
> + sunxi_nand = list_first_entry(&nfc->chips,
> + struct sunxi_nand_chip,
> + node);
> + nand_release(&sunxi_nand->nand);
> + sunxi_nand_ecc_cleanup(&sunxi_nand->nand.ecc);
> + list_del(&sunxi_nand->node);
> }
> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-15 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-15 8:12 [PATCH 1/5] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Use a consistent name for sunxi_nand_chip objects Boris Brezillon
2018-12-15 8:12 ` [PATCH 2/5] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Use struct_size() Boris Brezillon
2018-12-15 8:12 ` [PATCH 3/5] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Name nand_chip objects consistently Boris Brezillon
2018-12-15 8:12 ` [PATCH 4/5] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Stop passing mtd_info objects around Boris Brezillon
2018-12-15 8:12 ` [PATCH 5/5] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Add an SPDX tag Boris Brezillon
2018-12-15 8:18 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181215091856.4f10b60f@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox