From: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: fsmc: Keep bank enable bit set
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:51:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190114095105.4e2b5c5a@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190109215144.15749-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Hi Linus,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 22:51:44 +0100
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hammering the "bank enable" (PBKEN) bit on and off between
> every command crashes the Nomadik NHK15 with this message:
>
> Scanning device for bad blocks
> Unhandled fault: external abort on non-linefetch (0x008) at 0xcc95e000
> pgd = (ptrval)
> [cc95e000] *pgd=0b808811, *pte=40000653, *ppte=40000552
> Internal error: : 8 [#1] PREEMPT ARM
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.20.0-rc2+ #72
> Hardware name: Nomadik STn8815
> PC is at fsmc_exec_op+0x194/0x204
> (...)
>
> After a discussion we (me and Boris Brezillion) start to suspect
> that this bit does not immediately control the chip select line
> at all, it rather enables access to the bank and the hardware
> will drive the CS autonomously. If there is a NAND chip connected,
> we should keep this enabled.
>
> As fsmc_nand_setup() sets this bit, we can simply remove the
> offending code.
>
> Fixes: 550b9fc4e3af ("mtd: rawnand: fsmc: Stop implementing ->select_chip()")
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsmc_nand.c | 21 ---------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsmc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsmc_nand.c
> index 325b4414dccc..c9149a37f8f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsmc_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsmc_nand.c
> @@ -593,23 +593,6 @@ static void fsmc_write_buf_dma(struct fsmc_nand_data *host, const u8 *buf,
> dma_xfer(host, (void *)buf, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> }
>
> -/* fsmc_select_chip - assert or deassert nCE */
> -static void fsmc_ce_ctrl(struct fsmc_nand_data *host, bool assert)
> -{
> - u32 pc = readl(host->regs_va + FSMC_PC);
> -
> - if (!assert)
> - writel_relaxed(pc & ~FSMC_ENABLE, host->regs_va + FSMC_PC);
> - else
> - writel_relaxed(pc | FSMC_ENABLE, host->regs_va + FSMC_PC);
> -
> - /*
> - * nCE line changes must be applied before returning from this
> - * function.
> - */
> - mb();
> -}
> -
> /*
> * fsmc_exec_op - hook called by the core to execute NAND operations
> *
> @@ -627,8 +610,6 @@ static int fsmc_exec_op(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_operation *op,
>
> pr_debug("Executing operation [%d instructions]:\n", op->ninstrs);
>
> - fsmc_ce_ctrl(host, true);
> -
> for (op_id = 0; op_id < op->ninstrs; op_id++) {
> instr = &op->instrs[op_id];
>
> @@ -686,8 +667,6 @@ static int fsmc_exec_op(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_operation *op,
> }
> }
>
> - fsmc_ce_ctrl(host, false);
> -
> return ret;
> }
>
Not related to this patch, but I think we're missing a nand_reset()
call in the ->resume() path. Without it FSMC timings might be wrong
after a suspend if they're not defined in the DT. Would you mind sending
another patch to fix that, and maybe an extra patch to clear
FSMC_ENABLE in the ->remove() path and the ->probe()'s error path as
you suggested?
Thanks,
Boris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-14 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 21:51 [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: fsmc: Keep bank enable bit set Linus Walleij
2019-01-09 22:12 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-01-10 8:42 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-01-14 8:51 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2019-01-17 21:33 ` Linus Walleij
2019-01-18 6:36 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-01-18 11:44 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190114095105.4e2b5c5a@bbrezillon \
--to=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox