From: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Emil Lenngren <emil.lenngren@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spinand: Handle the case where PROGRAM LOAD does not reset the cache
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:08:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190125170851.3d918da5@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190125120910.59c33a4b@xps13>
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:09:10 +0100
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org> wrote on Thu, 24 Jan 2019
> 17:33:57 +0100:
>
> > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:16:37 +0100
> > Emil Lenngren <emil.lenngren@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Den tors 24 jan. 2019 kl 16:28 skrev Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>:
> > > >
> > > > On 24.01.19 15:20, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > > > Looks like PROGRAM LOAD (AKA write cache) does not necessarily reset
> > > > > the cache content to 0xFF (depends on vendor implementation), so we
> > > > > must fill the page cache entirely even if we only want to program the
> > > > > data portion of the page, otherwise we might corrupt the BBM or user
> > > > > data previously programmed in OOB area.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 7529df465248 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to support SPI NANDs")
> > > > > Reported-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
> > > > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
> > > >
> > > > Works fine (limited testing only yet), so:
> > > >
> > > > Tested-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Stefan
> > > >
> > >
> > > Can this quirk be made vendor specific?
> >
> > We can make it vendor specific, as long as it's an opt-in thing. This
> > way, the default behavior is the safest one, and only when we know a
> > chip does reset the cache content on a PROGRAM LOAD time can we add this
> > flag.
>
> I am fine with this approach.
Does that stand for a Reviewed-by/Acked-by? To make it clear, I was
saying that we should fix things first (with this fix) and only then
optimize things for chips that actually reset the cache when PROGRAM
LOAD is executed. I was not planning on sending a new version of this
patch, unless you see good reasons to do so.
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-25 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-24 14:20 [PATCH] mtd: spinand: Handle the case where PROGRAM LOAD does not reset the cache Boris Brezillon
2019-01-24 15:25 ` Stefan Roese
2019-01-24 16:16 ` Emil Lenngren
2019-01-24 16:33 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-01-25 11:09 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-01-25 16:08 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2019-01-28 9:55 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-01-31 11:32 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190125170851.3d918da5@bbrezillon \
--to=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=emil.lenngren@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sr@denx.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).