From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@mediatek.com>
Cc: richard@nod.at, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
srv_heupstream@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Correct low level time calculation of r/w cycle
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:59:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190430135910.1deddd51@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190430100250.28083-2-xiaolei.li@mediatek.com>
Hi Xiaolei,
Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@mediatek.com> wrote on Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:02:46
+0800:
> At present, the flow of calculating AC timing of read/write cycle in SDR
> mode is that:
> At first, calculate high hold time which is valid for both read and write
> cycle using the max value between tREH_min and tWH_min.
> Secondly, calculate WE# pulse width using tWP_min.
> Thridly, calculate RE# pulse width using the bigger one between tREA_max
> and tRP_min.
>
> But NAND SPEC shows that Controller should also meet write/read cycle time.
> That is write cycle time should be more than tWC_min and read cycle should
> be more than tRC_min. Obviously, we do not achieve that now.
>
> This patch corrects the low level time calculation to meet minimum
> read/write cycle time required. After getting the high hold time, WE# low
> level time will be promised to meet tWP_min and tWC_min requirement,
> and RE# low level time will be promised to meet tREA_max, tRP_min and
> tRC_min requirement.
>
> Fixes: edfee3619c49 ("mtd: nand: mtk: add ->setup_data_interface() hook")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> index b6b4602f5132..4fbb0c6ecae3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> @@ -508,7 +508,8 @@ static int mtk_nfc_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int csline,
> {
> struct mtk_nfc *nfc = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
> const struct nand_sdr_timings *timings;
> - u32 rate, tpoecs, tprecs, tc2r, tw2r, twh, twst, trlt;
> + u32 rate, tpoecs, tprecs, tc2r, tw2r, twh, twst = 0, trlt = 0;
> + u32 thold;
>
> timings = nand_get_sdr_timings(conf);
> if (IS_ERR(timings))
> @@ -544,11 +545,28 @@ static int mtk_nfc_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int csline,
> twh = DIV_ROUND_UP(twh * rate, 1000000) - 1;
> twh &= 0xf;
>
> - twst = timings->tWP_min / 1000;
> + /* Calculate real WE#/RE# hold time in nanosecond */
> + thold = (twh + 1) * 1000000 / rate;
> + /* nanosecond to picosecond */
> + thold *= 1000;
> +
> + /**
/*
> + * WE# low level time should be expaned to meet WE# pulse time
> + * and WE# cycle time at the same time.
> + */
> + if (thold < timings->tWC_min)
> + twst = timings->tWC_min - thold;
> + twst = max(timings->tWP_min, twst) / 1000;
> twst = DIV_ROUND_UP(twst * rate, 1000000) - 1;
> twst &= 0xf;
>
> - trlt = max(timings->tREA_max, timings->tRP_min) / 1000;
> + /**
Ditto
> + * RE# low level time should be expaned to meet RE# pulse time,
> + * RE# access time and RE# cycle time at the same time.
> + */
> + if (thold < timings->tRC_min)
> + trlt = timings->tRC_min - thold;
> + trlt = max3(trlt, timings->tREA_max, timings->tRP_min) / 1000;
> trlt = DIV_ROUND_UP(trlt * rate, 1000000) - 1;
> trlt &= 0xf;
>
With this fixed:
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-30 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-30 10:02 [PATCH v2 0/5] MTK NAND driver improvements and fixes Xiaolei Li
2019-04-30 10:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Correct low level time calculation of r/w cycle Xiaolei Li
2019-04-30 10:32 ` Sasha Levin
2019-05-05 7:06 ` xiaolei li
2019-05-06 8:11 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-30 11:59 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2019-05-05 7:12 ` xiaolei li
2019-04-30 10:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Improve data sampling timing for read cycle Xiaolei Li
2019-04-30 12:11 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-05-05 7:29 ` xiaolei li
2019-04-30 10:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Add validity check for CE# pin setting Xiaolei Li
2019-04-30 10:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Fix wrongly assigned OOB buffer pointer issue Xiaolei Li
2019-04-30 10:02 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Setup empty page threshold correctly Xiaolei Li
2019-04-30 12:17 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-05-05 7:50 ` xiaolei li
2019-04-30 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] MTK NAND driver improvements and fixes Miquel Raynal
2019-05-05 7:08 ` xiaolei li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190430135910.1deddd51@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaolei.li@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).