From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A22AC0044D for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:35:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C44702072F for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:35:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="HuRHppmR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C44702072F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=X3jD60sDfaFZL1tWtEHP5tPkA+VkmuTxdZT9xAqBB1I=; b=HuRHppmRnjCICP qwtRk/GgSLycVECrgWdcwmjikAlj7uimStwSG14ekNfbFe9KyM9KgoscQ2CRWvpHlzc1wtzrlpA4n yWGR/1uxG7P1g7CbWPVG16EqUZfOcm11OJ3BHPRP7v/V4p0bgxyJqbpsOmmzMvpRnC4rhih2X/ssI twmlNoZcZSmJaWvw3lfwaOVSXmIHG/fQh8f9OOEArfjOrakGd+jdMhYR9sWTSqf/5lIBKxTF4FpIb 1i+Vx+CV6xX6+VU9tTrlTgld3rRnRuH2j2M7EYwg3GPiyq5fBPy56OrmNjMuflSI/cfjHnfPwDxgA U0lHfbN0yy8DmLxAheiA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jC5GQ-00028Z-Gw; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:35:26 +0000 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e3e3]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jC5GN-00027H-Bd for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:35:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:2c:6930:5cf4:84a1:2763:fe0d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bbrezillon) by bhuna.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79F2C293DC6; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:35:21 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:35:17 +0100 From: Boris Brezillon To: "Shivamurthy Shastri (sshivamurthy)" Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] Add new series Micron SPI NAND devices Message-ID: <20200311183517.054cc300@collabora.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20200309115230.7207-1-sshivamurthy@micron.com> <20200311164932.23cc7a42@xps13> Organization: Collabora X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200311_103523_530222_40B5999A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.17 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra , "shiva.linuxworks@gmail.com" , Richard Weinberger , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Frieder Schrempf , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Miquel Raynal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:33:41 +0000 "Shivamurthy Shastri (sshivamurthy)" wrote: > Hi Miquel, > > > > > Hi Shiva, > > > > shiva.linuxworks@gmail.com wrote on Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:52:24 +0100: > > > > > From: Shivamurthy Shastri > > > > > > This patchset is for the new series of Micron SPI NAND devices, and the > > > following links are their datasheets. > > > > > > M78A: > > > [1] https://www.micron.com/~/media/documents/products/data- > > sheet/nand-flash/70-series/m78a_1gb_3v_nand_spi.pdf > > > [2] https://www.micron.com/~/media/documents/products/data- > > sheet/nand-flash/70-series/m78a_1gb_1_8v_nand_spi.pdf > > > > > > M79A: > > > [3] https://www.micron.com/~/media/documents/products/data- > > sheet/nand-flash/70-series/m79a_2gb_1_8v_nand_spi.pdf > > > [4] https://www.micron.com/~/media/documents/products/data- > > sheet/nand-flash/70-series/m79a_ddp_4gb_3v_nand_spi.pdf > > > > > > M70A: > > > [5] https://www.micron.com/~/media/documents/products/data- > > sheet/nand-flash/70-series/m70a_4gb_3v_nand_spi.pdf > > > [6] https://www.micron.com/~/media/documents/products/data- > > sheet/nand-flash/70-series/m70a_4gb_1_8v_nand_spi.pdf > > > [7] https://www.micron.com/~/media/documents/products/data- > > sheet/nand-flash/70-series/m70a_ddp_8gb_3v_nand_spi.pdf > > > [8] https://www.micron.com/~/media/documents/products/data- > > sheet/nand-flash/70-series/m70a_ddp_8gb_1_8v_nand_spi.pdf > > > > > > Changes since v5: > > > ----------------- > > > > > > 1. Rebased series to v5.6-rc1. > > > > I am very sorry but actually I had issues applying all your patches not > > because they were not based on v5.6-rc1, but because since then I > > applied a patch changing the detection that changed the content of a > > lot of structures (including in Micron's patches). > > > > Can you please rebase again on top of the current nand/next? I am very > > sorry for this extra work, this is my mistake. > > > > Head should be: > > > > a5d53ad26a8b ("mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Add support for flash-edu > > for dma transfers") > > > > And the culprit commit is: > > > > f1541773af49 ("mtd: spinand: rework detect procedure for different > > READ_ID operation") > > > I will rebase and send the patches. > Meanwhile, there will be small code change because of the READ_ID patch. > > Do I need to drop Reviewed-by from Boris? Nope, you can keep it. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/