linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] mtd: rawnand: onfi: Simplify the NAND operations during detection
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 09:00:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200422090052.5f27a42c@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200421164637.8086-7-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:46:35 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:

> There is no need for separate parameter page reads, the delay penalty
> is negligible so let's do read the three copies in one go.

		    ^let's read

In theory that's correct, but I fear this was done because some
controllers couldn't read 768 bytes in one go. Could we do that only if
the controller implements exec_op() and exec_op(check_only) returns true?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_onfi.c | 8 +-------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_onfi.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_onfi.c
> index d6124180b47b..b76772666b82 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_onfi.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_onfi.c
> @@ -160,19 +160,13 @@ int nand_onfi_detect(struct nand_chip *chip)
>  	if (!pbuf)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	ret = nand_read_param_page_op(chip, 0, NULL, 0);
> +	ret = nand_read_param_page_op(chip, 0, pbuf, 3 * sizeof(*pbuf));
>  	if (ret) {
>  		ret = 0;
>  		goto free_onfi_param_page;
>  	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> -		ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, &pbuf[i], sizeof(*pbuf), true);
> -		if (ret) {
> -			ret = 0;
> -			goto free_onfi_param_page;
> -		}
> -
>  		crc = onfi_crc16(ONFI_CRC_BASE, (u8 *)&pbuf[i], 254);
>  		if (crc == le16_to_cpu(pbuf[i].crc)) {
>  			p = &pbuf[i];


______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-22  7:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-21 16:46 [PATCH 0/8] Misc timing changes Miquel Raynal
2020-04-21 16:46 ` [PATCH 1/8] mtd: rawnand: timings: Add mode information to the timings structure Miquel Raynal
2020-04-22  6:36   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-21 16:46 ` [PATCH 2/8] mtd: rawnand: timings: Fix default tR_max and tCCS_min timings Miquel Raynal
2020-04-22  6:47   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-21 16:46 ` [PATCH 3/8] mtd: rawnand: onfi: Fix redundancy detection check Miquel Raynal
2020-04-22  6:49   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-21 16:46 ` [PATCH 4/8] mtd: rawnand: onfi: Use an intermediate variable to decomplefixy conditions Miquel Raynal
2020-04-22  6:51   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-21 16:46 ` [PATCH 5/8] mtd: rawnand: onfi: Avoid doing a copy of the parameter page Miquel Raynal
2020-04-22  6:54   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-21 16:46 ` [PATCH 6/8] mtd: rawnand: onfi: Simplify the NAND operations during detection Miquel Raynal
2020-04-22  7:00   ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2020-04-22  7:25     ` Miquel Raynal
2020-04-21 16:46 ` [PATCH 7/8] mtd: rawnand: jedec: Use an intermediate variable to decomplefixy conditions Miquel Raynal
2020-04-22  7:02   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-22  8:49   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2020-04-22  9:33     ` Miquel Raynal
2020-04-21 16:46 ` [PATCH 8/8] mtd: rawnand: jedec: Simplify the NAND operations during detection Miquel Raynal
2020-04-22  7:05   ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200422090052.5f27a42c@collabora.com \
    --to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=nagasure@xilinx.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).