linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] mtd: rawnand: Rename the use_bufpoi variables
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:05:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200428110501.2caafbd9@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200425104440.5a3144fe@collabora.com>

Hi Boris,

Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> wrote on Sat, 25 Apr
2020 10:44:40 +0200:

> On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 19:36:26 +0200
> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> 
> > Both in nand_do_read_ops() and nand_do_write_ops() there is a boolean
> > called use_bufpoi which is set to true in case of unaligned request or
> > when there is a need for a DMA-able buffer. It basically means "use a
> > bounce buffer".
> > 
> > Depending on the value of use_bufpoi, the bufpoi variable is always
> > used and will either point to the original buffer or to the nand_chip
> > structure "internal data buffer" (this buffer is allocated with
> > kmalloc() on purpose so that it will be DMA-compliant).
> > 
> > In all cases bufpoi is used so the boolean name is misleading. Rename
> > use_bufpoi to be use_bouce_buf to be more accurate.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>  
> 
> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
> 
> I wonder if we shouldn't find a better name for bufpoi too. Not sure
> what the poi means here (pointer?). So maybe just rename those into
> read_buf, write_buf (since buf seems to be declared already).

My first patch also renamed bufpoi.

Actually I read it like "buf pointer" and it makes sense and is used
all across nand_base.c so I decided to let it as-is for now.

Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-28  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-24 17:36 [PATCH 00/10] Supporting restricted NAND controllers Miquel Raynal
2020-04-24 17:36 ` [PATCH 01/10] mtd: rawnand: Translate obscure bitfields into readable macros Miquel Raynal
2020-04-25  8:33   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-28  9:46     ` Miquel Raynal
2020-04-24 17:36 ` [PATCH 02/10] mtd: rawnand: Reorder the nand_chip->options flags Miquel Raynal
2020-04-25  8:36   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-24 17:36 ` [PATCH 03/10] mtd: rawnand: Rename a NAND chip option Miquel Raynal
2020-04-25  8:39   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-28 12:05     ` Miquel Raynal
2020-04-24 17:36 ` [PATCH 04/10] mtd: rawnand: Fix comments about the use of bufpoi Miquel Raynal
2020-04-25  8:40   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-24 17:36 ` [PATCH 05/10] mtd: rawnand: Rename the use_bufpoi variables Miquel Raynal
2020-04-25  8:44   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-28  9:05     ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2020-04-28  9:11       ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-24 17:36 ` [PATCH 06/10] mtd: rawnand: Avoid indirect access to ->data_buf() Miquel Raynal
2020-04-25  8:45   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-24 17:36 ` [PATCH 07/10] mtd: rawnand: Help supporting controllers that are not able to split operations Miquel Raynal
2020-04-25  9:11   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-24 17:36 ` [PATCH 08/10] mtd: rawnand: onfi: Add an alternative parameter page read Miquel Raynal
2020-04-24 17:36 ` [PATCH 09/10] mtd: rawnand: jedec: " Miquel Raynal
2020-04-24 17:36 ` [PATCH 10/10] mtd: rawnand: Fallback on easier operations when needed Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200428110501.2caafbd9@xps13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=nagasure@xilinx.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).