From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44E1C83000 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A30AE206F0 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="a3aaqhhw" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A30AE206F0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=BRHm+HNIioi8Yx52HuiltqgWkgh2F0Eqp9x52yxqqTo=; b=a3aaqhhwNxOEf2 /8aZLulpUwe+UVtoeaiWVK6Q8Pb/aXkOobluZw0aZ0LhF1KuhdD8pQ7zKJpS4HMMPQc3OZc/RNTSh O1JkcBfnWYsb5+LimbnLEZrm5uI3ug53Q64s2RlaNxnoa4fqN6ZCzRGsH75+fK+uyLbPV/e8qVmAF 77XVpTnDF4uIlrx44v853dBgYaeEG7/1R6YXx4Y0JTrmn5C1U8HxF9pR4qQZd4LD/KDm0P/eihbya FhN2M02RIZX8qXUWYgM1nw/tNH5ETsJZ9C54PB43NDDy9BHYwtFJmCH7w/7tr+MkcYpVYEOWf4UvF sYx4b+NTL5SxkkcyqwKw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jTpTN-0001NH-WB; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:22:09 +0000 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jTpTK-0001M9-Ou for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:22:08 +0000 Received: from xps13 (unknown [91.224.148.103]) (Authenticated sender: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E0EE24000F; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:22:00 +0200 From: Miquel Raynal To: Boris Brezillon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] mtd: rawnand: Rename a NAND chip option Message-ID: <20200429182200.4240303d@xps13> In-Reply-To: <20200429180816.14f16be0@collabora.com> References: <20200429155540.22048-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20200429155540.22048-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20200429180816.14f16be0@collabora.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200429_092206_941566_9FD60EB5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.10 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Michal Simek , Vignesh Raghavendra , Tudor Ambarus , Richard Weinberger , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Petazzoni , Naga Sureshkumar Relli Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Boris, Boris Brezillon wrote on Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:08:16 +0200: > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:55:32 +0200 > Miquel Raynal wrote: > > > NAND controller drivers can set the NAND_USE_BOUNCE_BUFFER flag to a > > chip 'option' field. With this flag, the core is responsible of > > providing DMA-able buffers. > > > > The current behavior is to not force the use of a bounce buffer when > > the core thinks this is not needed. So in the end the name is a bit > > misleading, because in theory we will always have a DMA buffer but in > > practice it will not always be a bounce buffer. > > > > Rename this flag NAND_USE_DMA_BUFFER to be more accurate. > > I still think this one should be named NAND_CONTROLLER_USES_DMA. Actually I want to rework all the flags and prefix them with NAND_CONTROLLER, that's why I am keeping the NAND_ prefix. I can change the _USE_DMA_BUFFER into _USES_DMA though. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/