From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B083C83004 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:37:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DCEA208FE for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:37:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="HDGb+oLI" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1DCEA208FE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=0ZT50Xhq1oP2Y3iInFKjL1sxmFM9EkX4B1d++6pl8Jg=; b=HDGb+oLI1YaDgg INSRtAdjAPCyShJCLfGO9Db7Yod3jFVG8D2G+bUFHhFhexTt24LIEZ79h3GM8t+2N+JYEP8XyhF8c 73gGwQT0K9x1sBekNlF7rE50itVk43pxTemDN36Ok4ElzD/E4OB9qG/4/YfKWpauyDGECedFV/inq 6uy8F3s3SR5/73xpTV363H16M2S7XVIS6jXYo+3gy6/3SgKCdqvgc7+tJN2tg0AQIonkJBkNHtGAD MeGv5e+HxiPZh44cXiU+NJMUe+W3qzd24hTv9Z4PA2p+RRTH+r7aDIarvhCNUzXzQjtG4SyCo6dwd uhYpFP0AWPRYC51lXOXA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jTpha-0005Ea-L8; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:36:50 +0000 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e3e3]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jTphX-0005DZ-6K for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:36:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:2c:6930:5cf4:84a1:2763:fe0d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bbrezillon) by bhuna.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8382F2A1B17; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:36:45 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:36:42 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Miquel Raynal Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] mtd: rawnand: Rename a NAND chip option Message-ID: <20200429183642.15e62ae5@collabora.com> In-Reply-To: <20200429183231.1a3607c1@collabora.com> References: <20200429155540.22048-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20200429155540.22048-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20200429180816.14f16be0@collabora.com> <20200429182200.4240303d@xps13> <20200429183231.1a3607c1@collabora.com> Organization: Collabora X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200429_093647_360663_DFAB577D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.92 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Michal Simek , Vignesh Raghavendra , Tudor Ambarus , Richard Weinberger , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Petazzoni , Naga Sureshkumar Relli Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:32:31 +0200 Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:22:00 +0200 > Miquel Raynal wrote: > > > Hi Boris, > > > > Boris Brezillon wrote on Wed, 29 Apr > > 2020 18:08:16 +0200: > > > > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:55:32 +0200 > > > Miquel Raynal wrote: > > > > > > > NAND controller drivers can set the NAND_USE_BOUNCE_BUFFER flag to a > > > > chip 'option' field. With this flag, the core is responsible of > > > > providing DMA-able buffers. > > > > > > > > The current behavior is to not force the use of a bounce buffer when > > > > the core thinks this is not needed. So in the end the name is a bit > > > > misleading, because in theory we will always have a DMA buffer but in > > > > practice it will not always be a bounce buffer. > > > > > > > > Rename this flag NAND_USE_DMA_BUFFER to be more accurate. > > > > > > I still think this one should be named NAND_CONTROLLER_USES_DMA. > > > > Actually I want to rework all the flags and prefix them with > > NAND_CONTROLLER, that's why I am keeping the NAND_ prefix. I can change > > the _USE_DMA_BUFFER into _USES_DMA though. > > Ack on NAND_USES_DMA. But then I wonder if it's really worth renaming this field now if you plan to rename it again later :-). ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/