public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] mtd: rawnand: onfi: Adapt the parameter page read to constraint controllers
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 10:16:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200504101615.561a9c6a@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200502101215.49e11fa5@collabora.com>

Hi Boris,

Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> wrote on Sat, 2 May
2020 10:12:15 +0200:

> On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:55:36 +0200
> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> 
> > We already know that there are controllers not able to read the three
> > copies of the parameter page in one go. The workaround was to first
> > request the controller to assert command and address cycles on the
> > NAND bus to trigger a parameter page read, and then do a read
> > operation for each page.
> > 
> > But there are also controllers which are not able to split the
> > parameter page read between the command/address cycles and the actual
> > data operation.
> > 
> > All controllers are expected to be able to change the read column
> > though. So let's use a regular parameter page read operation for the
> > first iteration and use a change read column operation for the
> > following copies.
> > 
> > The extra command and address cycles sent over the NAND bus are
> > negligible compared to the amount of data that is being transferred
> > anyway.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_onfi.c | 14 +++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_onfi.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_onfi.c
> > index ee0f2c2549c1..19e1be94c7e3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_onfi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_onfi.c
> > @@ -160,14 +160,14 @@ int nand_onfi_detect(struct nand_chip *chip)
> >  	if (!pbuf)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >  
> > -	ret = nand_read_param_page_op(chip, 0, NULL, 0);
> > -	if (ret) {
> > -		ret = 0;
> > -		goto free_onfi_param_page;
> > -	}
> > -
> >  	for (i = 0; i < ONFI_PARAM_PAGES; i++) {
> > -		ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, &pbuf[i], sizeof(*pbuf), true);
> > +		if (!i)
> > +			ret = nand_read_param_page_op(chip, 0, &pbuf[i],
> > +						      sizeof(*pbuf));
> > +		else
> > +			ret = nand_change_read_column_op(chip, sizeof(*pbuf) * i,
> > +							 &pbuf[i], sizeof(*pbuf),
> > +							 true);  
> 
> Oops! Looks like this this change will break at least 3 drivers which
> support NAND_CMD_PARAM but don't support NAND_CMD_RNDOUT:
> fsl_ifc_nand, mxc_nand and qcom_nandc.


That's right, here is the new implementation that I am going to share:

-> if (!i) -> READ PARAM PAGE
-> if (use_datain) -> DATA IN
-> else -> RNDOUT.

The use_datain boolean is set to true in the following cases:
- the driver is compliant with exec-op and supports simple reads
- the driver is not compliant with exec-op (we keep the behavior
  unchanged for these drivers).

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-04  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-29 15:55 [PATCH v2 00/11] Supporting restricted NAND controllers Miquel Raynal
2020-04-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] mtd: rawnand: Translate obscure bitfields into readable macros Miquel Raynal
2020-04-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] mtd: rawnand: Reorder the nand_chip->options flags Miquel Raynal
2020-04-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] mtd: rawnand: Rename a NAND chip option Miquel Raynal
2020-04-29 16:08   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-29 16:22     ` Miquel Raynal
2020-04-29 16:32       ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-29 16:36         ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-29 16:54           ` Miquel Raynal
2020-04-29 18:55             ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] mtd: rawnand: Fix comments about the use of bufpoi Miquel Raynal
2020-04-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] mtd: rawnand: Rename the use_bufpoi variables Miquel Raynal
2020-04-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] mtd: rawnand: Avoid indirect access to ->data_buf() Miquel Raynal
2020-04-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] mtd: rawnand: onfi: Adapt the parameter page read to constraint controllers Miquel Raynal
2020-04-29 16:09   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-02  8:12   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-04  8:16     ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2020-04-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] mtd: rawnand: jedec: " Miquel Raynal
2020-04-29 16:04   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-29 16:23     ` Miquel Raynal
2020-05-03 19:06     ` Miquel Raynal
2020-05-03 19:44       ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-04  8:02         ` Miquel Raynal
2020-04-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] mtd: rawnand: Expose monolithic read/write_page_raw() helpers Miquel Raynal
2020-04-29 16:15   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-29 16:26     ` Miquel Raynal
2020-04-29 16:31       ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-29 16:52         ` Miquel Raynal
2020-04-29 19:03           ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] mtd: rawnand: Allow controllers to overload soft ECC hooks Miquel Raynal
2020-04-29 16:15   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] mtd: rawnand: micron: Allow controllers to overload raw accessors Miquel Raynal
2020-04-29 16:16   ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200504101615.561a9c6a@xps13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=nagasure@xilinx.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox