From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] mtd: rawnand: jedec: Adapt the parameter page read to constraint controllers
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 10:51:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200504105144.6273643b@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200504082414.7327-11-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
On Mon, 4 May 2020 10:24:11 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> We already know that there are controllers not able to read the three
> copies of the parameter page in one go. The workaround was to first
> request the controller to assert command and address cycles on the
> NAND bus to trigger a parameter page read, and then do a read
> operation for each page.
>
> But there are also controllers which are not able to split the
> parameter page read between the command/address cycles and the actual
> data operation.
>
> Let's use a regular PARAMETER PAGE READ operation for the first
> iteration and use eithe a CHANGE READ COLUMN or a simple DATA READ
> operation for the following copies, depending on what the controller
> supports. The default for non-exec-op compliant drivers remains
> unchanged: use a SIMPLE READ.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_jedec.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_jedec.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_jedec.c
> index 63069f1948a8..be270b36317e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_jedec.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_jedec.c
> @@ -25,8 +25,9 @@ int nand_jedec_detect(struct nand_chip *chip)
> {
> struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> struct nand_memory_organization *memorg;
> - struct nand_jedec_params *p;
> + struct nand_jedec_params *p = NULL, *pbuf;
> struct jedec_ecc_info *ecc;
> + bool use_datain = false;
> int jedec_version = 0;
> char id[5];
> int i, val, ret;
> @@ -40,25 +41,32 @@ int nand_jedec_detect(struct nand_chip *chip)
> return 0;
>
> /* JEDEC chip: allocate a buffer to hold its parameter page */
> - p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!p)
> + pbuf = kzalloc(sizeof(*pbuf) * JEDEC_PARAM_PAGES, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pbuf)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - ret = nand_read_param_page_op(chip, 0x40, NULL, 0);
> - if (ret) {
> - ret = 0;
> - goto free_jedec_param_page;
> - }
> + if (!nand_has_exec_op(chip) ||
> + (nand_read_data_op(chip, &pbuf[0], sizeof(*pbuf), true, true) == 0))
> + use_datain = true;
>
> for (i = 0; i < JEDEC_PARAM_PAGES; i++) {
> - ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, p, sizeof(*p), true, false);
> + if (!i)
> + ret = nand_read_param_page_op(chip, 0x40, &pbuf[i],
> + sizeof(*pbuf));
> + else if (use_datain)
> + ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, &pbuf[i], sizeof(*pbuf),
> + true, false);
> + else
> + ret = nand_change_read_column_op(chip, sizeof(*pbuf) * i,
> + &pbuf[i], sizeof(*pbuf),
> + true);
Now that you only ever read a page at a time, and given you don't do
the majority_bit() thing when all pages are corrupted, I'd suggest
sticking to one sizeof(*p) allocation and getting rid of the pbuf var.
But it's not a big deal, so feel free to add
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
if you don't want to send a new version.
> if (ret) {
> ret = 0;
> goto free_jedec_param_page;
> }
>
> - crc = onfi_crc16(ONFI_CRC_BASE, (u8 *)p, 510);
> - if (crc == le16_to_cpu(p->crc))
> + crc = onfi_crc16(ONFI_CRC_BASE, (u8 *)&pbuf[i], 510);
> + if (crc == le16_to_cpu(pbuf[i].crc))
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -67,6 +75,8 @@ int nand_jedec_detect(struct nand_chip *chip)
> goto free_jedec_param_page;
> }
>
> + p = &pbuf[i];
> +
> /* Check version */
> val = le16_to_cpu(p->revision);
> if (val & (1 << 2))
> @@ -122,6 +132,6 @@ int nand_jedec_detect(struct nand_chip *chip)
> ret = 1;
>
> free_jedec_param_page:
> - kfree(p);
> + kfree(pbuf);
> return ret;
> }
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-04 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-04 8:24 [PATCH v3 00/13] Supporting restricted NAND controllers Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] mtd: rawnand: Translate obscure bitfields into readable macros Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] mtd: rawnand: Reorder the nand_chip->options flags Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] mtd: rawnand: Rename a NAND chip option Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] mtd: rawnand: Fix comments about the use of bufpoi Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] mtd: rawnand: Rename the use_bufpoi variables Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] mtd: rawnand: Avoid indirect access to ->data_buf() Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] mtd: rawnand: Add a helper to check supported operations Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] mtd: rawnand: Give the possibility to verify a read operation is supported Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] mtd: rawnand: onfi: Adapt the parameter page read to constraint controllers Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-04 9:01 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] mtd: rawnand: jedec: " Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:51 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2020-05-04 8:57 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] mtd: rawnand: Expose monolithic read/write_page_raw() helpers Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:54 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] mtd: rawnand: Allow controllers to overload soft ECC hooks Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] mtd: rawnand: micron: Allow controllers to overload raw accessors Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200504105144.6273643b@collabora.com \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=nagasure@xilinx.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).