From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/13] mtd: rawnand: Expose monolithic read/write_page_raw() helpers
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 10:54:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200504105420.5eadef7c@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200504082414.7327-12-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
On Mon, 4 May 2020 10:24:12 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> The current nand_read/write_page_raw() helpers are already widely used
> but do not fit the purpose of "constrained" controllers which cannot,
> for instance, separate command/address cycles with data cycles.
>
> Workaround this issue by proposing alternative helpers that cannot be
^can
> used by controller drivers instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h | 8 +++-
> 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> index 413974df8a5e..6ec24eee355b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> @@ -2638,6 +2638,48 @@ int nand_read_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, int oob_required,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_read_page_raw);
>
> +/**
> + * nand_monolithic_read_page_raw - Monolithic page read in raw mode
> + * @chip: NAND chip info structure
> + * @buf: buffer to store read data
> + * @oob_required: caller requires OOB data read to chip->oob_poi
> + * @page: page number to read
> + *
> + * This is a raw page read, ie. without any error detection/correction.
> + * Monolithic means we are requesting all the relevant data (main plus
> + * eventually OOB) to be loaded in the NAND cache and sent over the
> + * bus (from the NAND chip to the NAND controller) in a single
> + * operation. This is an alternative to nand_read_page_raw(), which
> + * first reads the main data, and if the OOB data is requested too,
> + * then reads more data on the bus. Indeed, this approach is not
> + * well supported by all controller drivers.
I'd drop the last sentence. The rest looks good.
> + */
> +int nand_monolithic_read_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 *buf,
> + int oob_required, int page)
> +{
> + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> + unsigned int size = mtd->writesize;
> + u8 *read_buf = buf;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (oob_required) {
> + size += mtd->oobsize;
> +
> + if (buf != chip->data_buf)
> + read_buf = nand_get_data_buf(chip);
> + }
> +
> + ret = nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, read_buf, size);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (buf != chip->data_buf)
> + memcpy(buf, read_buf, mtd->writesize);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_monolithic_read_page_raw);
> +
> /**
> * nand_read_page_raw_syndrome - [INTERN] read raw page data without ecc
> * @chip: nand chip info structure
> @@ -3646,6 +3688,43 @@ int nand_write_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip, const uint8_t *buf,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_write_page_raw);
>
> +/**
> + * nand_monolithic_write_page_raw - Monolithic page write in raw mode
> + * @chip: NAND chip info structure
> + * @buf: data buffer to write
> + * @oob_required: must write chip->oob_poi to OOB
> + * @page: page number to write
> + *
> + * This is a raw page write, ie. without any error detection/correction.
> + * Monolithic means we are requesting all the relevant data (main plus
> + * eventually OOB) to be sent over the bus and effectively programmed
> + * into the NAND chip arrays in a single operation. This is an
> + * alternative to nand_write_page_raw(), which first sends the main
> + * data, then eventually send the OOB data by latching more data
> + * cycles on the NAND bus, and finally sends the program command to
> + * synchronyze the NAND chip cache. Indeed, this approach is not well
> + * supported by all controller drivers.
Ditto.
With this addressed:
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
> + */
> +int nand_monolithic_write_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip, const u8 *buf,
> + int oob_required, int page)
> +{
> + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> + unsigned int size = mtd->writesize;
> + u8 *write_buf = (u8 *)buf;
> +
> + if (oob_required) {
> + size += mtd->oobsize;
> +
> + if (buf != chip->data_buf) {
> + write_buf = nand_get_data_buf(chip);
> + memcpy(write_buf, buf, mtd->writesize);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return nand_prog_page_op(chip, page, 0, write_buf, size);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_monolithic_write_page_raw);
> +
> /**
> * nand_write_page_raw_syndrome - [INTERN] raw page write function
> * @chip: nand chip info structure
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
> index 70380c91731c..830e05dd1e1d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
> @@ -1328,13 +1328,17 @@ int nand_read_oob_std(struct nand_chip *chip, int page);
> int nand_get_set_features_notsupp(struct nand_chip *chip, int addr,
> u8 *subfeature_param);
>
> -/* Default read_page_raw implementation */
> +/* Default read_page_raw implementations */
> int nand_read_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, int oob_required,
> int page);
> +int nand_monolithic_read_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> + int oob_required, int page);
>
> -/* Default write_page_raw implementation */
> +/* Default write_page_raw implementations */
> int nand_write_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip, const uint8_t *buf,
> int oob_required, int page);
> +int nand_monolithic_write_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip, const uint8_t *buf,
> + int oob_required, int page);
>
> /* Reset and initialize a NAND device */
> int nand_reset(struct nand_chip *chip, int chipnr);
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-04 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-04 8:24 [PATCH v3 00/13] Supporting restricted NAND controllers Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] mtd: rawnand: Translate obscure bitfields into readable macros Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] mtd: rawnand: Reorder the nand_chip->options flags Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] mtd: rawnand: Rename a NAND chip option Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] mtd: rawnand: Fix comments about the use of bufpoi Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] mtd: rawnand: Rename the use_bufpoi variables Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] mtd: rawnand: Avoid indirect access to ->data_buf() Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] mtd: rawnand: Add a helper to check supported operations Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] mtd: rawnand: Give the possibility to verify a read operation is supported Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] mtd: rawnand: onfi: Adapt the parameter page read to constraint controllers Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-04 9:01 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] mtd: rawnand: jedec: " Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:51 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-04 8:57 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] mtd: rawnand: Expose monolithic read/write_page_raw() helpers Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:54 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] mtd: rawnand: Allow controllers to overload soft ECC hooks Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] mtd: rawnand: micron: Allow controllers to overload raw accessors Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200504105420.5eadef7c@collabora.com \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=nagasure@xilinx.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).