From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@micron.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Steve deRosier <derosier@gmail.com>,
"Zoltan Szubbocsev \(zszubbocsev\)" <zszubbocsev@micron.com>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
tglx <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Piotr Wojtaszczyk <WojtaszczykP@cumminsallison.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: rawnand: micron: Address the shallow erase issue
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 11:40:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200507114044.1f0b51af@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR08MB568434AC9C9168C016CC1592DBA50@BN7PR08MB5684.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, 7 May 2020 09:28:29 +0000
"Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@micron.com> wrote:
> Hi, Boris, Richard
>
> > >
> > > A missing VID header plus good payload will cause UBI to stop
> > > attaching since it violates the IO model.
> >
> > Sure, and that's not what we want to do anyway. We basically have 2 choices
> > here:
> >
> > 1/ overwrite all pages starting from page 0 and ending at page 15. This will lead
> > to ECC errors on already written pages, and 0-filled pages for others (unless we
> > go for a raw write, in which case it might actually lead to ECC errors depending
> > on the engine).
>
> No need for overwriting all pages. I overwrite EC and VID page just for prevent of
> Erase power loss issue. But you hate this since FS-specific approach.
> According to Richard's emails, we don't need to overwrite page0, overwrite page1
> Is enough.
It's still UBI specific, so that's still a no-go for me.
>
> > 2/ track already written pages (by reading them first), and only writes those that
> > have not been written yet. That means no ECC error in that case, and no
> > corrupted EC/VID header as well.
>
> This is similar with my patch approach, but corrupted EC and VID headers.
>
> I have two proposals:
> 1. rebase my patch, and copy one idea from Miquel's patch which records the programmed pages.
> But page 1 should be overwrote considering the UBIFS re-erase mechanism.
See above, and remember we do all that because Micron broke one of the
base assumptions we have about NANDs => erase should reset all bits to
1 or return an error if that fails.
>
> 2. add a new padding structure in the MTD, which is used to filling empty page in the MTD.
> And once FS layer detects this padding data, just ignore or trigger re-erase this block.
Not sure what you mean by padding structure, but yes, filling empty
pages with 0s and expecting the FS/wear-leveling layers to be happy
with that would be ideal. But, as for the "erase only 2-page because
this is where UBI puts its VID header" thing, that's a NACK on my side
if you want to introduce a new pattern that's only understood by
UBI/UBIFS.
I really wish FS/wear-leveling layers were immune to corrupted/invalid
LEBs they should no longer reference, but according to Richard, that's
not that simple.
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-07 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-03 11:40 [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix proposal for the Micron shallow erase issue Miquel Raynal
2020-05-03 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: rawnand: Add the nand_chip->erase hook Miquel Raynal
2020-05-03 15:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-03 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: rawnand: Add the nand_chip->write_oob hook Miquel Raynal
2020-05-03 15:09 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-03 17:02 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-05-03 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: rawnand: micron: Address the shallow erase issue Miquel Raynal
2020-05-03 16:10 ` Steve deRosier
2020-05-03 16:34 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-03 16:36 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-05-03 19:57 ` Steve deRosier
2020-05-06 8:37 ` [EXT] " Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2020-05-06 8:28 ` [EXT] " Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2020-05-06 8:45 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-06 15:50 ` Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2020-05-06 16:04 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-06 16:09 ` Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2020-05-06 16:29 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-06 16:50 ` Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2020-05-06 18:44 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-05-06 19:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-06 19:23 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-05-06 20:40 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-06 20:59 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-05-06 21:11 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-07 9:28 ` Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2020-05-07 9:40 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2020-05-07 9:28 ` Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2020-05-07 9:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-07 10:02 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-05-07 12:20 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200507114044.1f0b51af@collabora.com \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=WojtaszczykP@cumminsallison.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=derosier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=zszubbocsev@micron.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox