linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus@gmail.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: ingenic: Convert the driver to exec_op()
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 21:35:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200518213555.38e3a570@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200518212422.23316760@collabora.com>

On Mon, 18 May 2020 21:24:22 +0200
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 18 May 2020 19:50:04 +0200
> Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Boris,
> > 
> > Le lun. 18 mai 2020 à 18:56, Boris Brezillon 
> > <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> a écrit :
> > > Let's convert the driver to exec_op() to have one less driver relying
> > > on the legacy interface.  
> > 
> > Great work, thanks for that.
> > 
> > However it does not work :( nand_scan() returns error -145.
> 
> Looks like the R/B signal is inverted. Can you try with the
> following diff applied?

I checked the DT, and the GPIO is indeed declared GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW,
which explain why the test is inverted. Because of DT ABI stability it
might not be an option to change that, but the signal should actually be
declared GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH.

> 
> --->8---
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c
> index dcecd54af20b..9206792629a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c
> @@ -249,6 +249,26 @@ static int ingenic_nand_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
>         return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int ingenic_nand_gpio_waitrdy(struct gpio_desc *gpiod,
> +                                    unsigned long timeout_ms)
> +{
> +       /*
> +        * Wait until R/B pin indicates chip is ready or timeout occurs.
> +        * +1 below is necessary because if we are now in the last fraction
> +        * of jiffy and msecs_to_jiffies is 1 then we will wait only that
> +        * small jiffy fraction - possibly leading to false timeout.
> +       */
> +       timeout_ms = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms) + 1;
> +       do {
> +               if (!gpiod_get_value_cansleep(gpiod))
> +                       return 0;
> +
> +               cond_resched();
> +       } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout_ms));
> +
> +       return !gpiod_get_value_cansleep(gpiod) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
> +};
> +
>  static int ingenic_nand_exec_instr(struct nand_chip *chip,
>                                    struct ingenic_nand_cs *cs,
>                                    const struct nand_op_instr *instr)
> @@ -294,8 +314,8 @@ static int ingenic_nand_exec_instr(struct nand_chip *chip,
>                         return nand_soft_waitrdy(chip,
>                                                  instr->ctx.waitrdy.timeout_ms);
>  
> -               return nand_gpio_waitrdy(chip, nand->busy_gpio,
> -                                        instr->ctx.waitrdy.timeout_ms);
> +               return ingenic_nand_gpio_waitrdy(nand->busy_gpio,
> +                                                instr->ctx.waitrdy.timeout_ms);
>         default:
>                 break;
>         }
> @@ -322,6 +342,9 @@ static int ingenic_nand_exec_op(struct nand_chip *chip,
>                 ret = ingenic_nand_exec_instr(chip, cs, &op->instrs[i]);
>                 if (ret)
>                         break;
> +
> +               if (op->instrs[i].delay_ns)
> +                       ndelay(op->instrs[i].delay_ns);
>         }
>         jz4780_nemc_assert(nfc->dev, cs->bank, false);
>  


______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-18 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-18 16:56 [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: ingenic: Convert the driver to exec_op() Boris Brezillon
2020-05-18 17:50 ` Paul Cercueil
2020-05-18 19:24   ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-18 19:35     ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2020-05-19 15:04       ` Paul Cercueil
2020-05-19 17:28         ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-19 21:12           ` Paul Cercueil
2020-05-19 23:13             ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-19 14:52     ` Paul Cercueil
2020-05-19 15:01       ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-19 15:10         ` Paul Cercueil
2020-05-19 17:35           ` Boris Brezillon
2020-05-19 21:15             ` Paul Cercueil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200518213555.38e3a570@collabora.com \
    --to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=harveyhuntnexus@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).