From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: micron: Adapt the PAGE READ flow to constraint controllers
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 10:39:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200519103919.50f4417e@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200519074639.23777-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
On Tue, 19 May 2020 09:46:39 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> There are controllers not able to just read data cycles on the
> bus. There are controllers not able to do a change column.
>
> If we want to support both, we need to check which operation is
> supported first. This is the exact same mechanism that is in use for
> parameter page reads (ONFI/JEDEC) as the same problem occurs.
>
> Speed testing does not show any throughput penalty so we do not
> optimize more than that. However it is likely that, in the future, a
> more robust and exhaustive test will run at boot time to avoid
> re-checking what is supported and what is not at every call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
This looks good to me, just one thing to address below and you can add
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> index b2b047b245f4..bbd0ffbae19a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ static int micron_nand_on_die_ecc_status_4(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 status,
> struct micron_nand *micron = nand_get_manufacturer_data(chip);
> struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> unsigned int step, max_bitflips = 0;
> + bool use_datain = false;
> int ret;
>
> if (!(status & NAND_ECC_STATUS_WRITE_RECOMMENDED)) {
> @@ -211,8 +212,18 @@ static int micron_nand_on_die_ecc_status_4(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 status,
> * in non-raw mode, even if the user did not request those bytes.
> */
> if (!oob_required) {
> - ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize,
> - false, false);
Can we add a comment explaining what we're doing here (basically a
condensed version of the commit message).
> + if (!nand_has_exec_op(chip) ||
> + !nand_read_data_op(chip, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize, false,
> + true))
> + use_datain = true;
> +
> + if (use_datain)
> + ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, chip->oob_poi,
> + mtd->oobsize, false, false);
> + else
> + ret = nand_change_read_column_op(chip, mtd->writesize,
> + chip->oob_poi,
> + mtd->oobsize, false);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -285,6 +296,7 @@ micron_nand_read_page_on_die_ecc(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> int oob_required, int page)
> {
> struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> + bool use_datain = false;
> u8 status;
> int ret, max_bitflips = 0;
>
> @@ -300,14 +312,28 @@ micron_nand_read_page_on_die_ecc(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> if (ret)
> goto out;
>
> - ret = nand_exit_status_op(chip);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out;
Same here.
> + if (!nand_has_exec_op(chip) ||
> + !nand_read_data_op(chip, buf, mtd->writesize, false, true))
> + use_datain = true;
>
> - ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, buf, mtd->writesize, false, false);
> - if (!ret && oob_required)
> - ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize,
> - false, false);
> + if (use_datain) {
> + ret = nand_exit_status_op(chip);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, buf, mtd->writesize, false,
> + false);
> + if (!ret && oob_required)
> + ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, chip->oob_poi,
> + mtd->oobsize, false, false);
> + } else {
> + ret = nand_change_read_column_op(chip, 0, buf, mtd->writesize,
> + false);
> + if (!ret && oob_required)
> + ret = nand_change_read_column_op(chip, mtd->writesize,
> + chip->oob_poi,
> + mtd->oobsize, false);
> + }
>
> if (chip->ecc.strength == 4)
> max_bitflips = micron_nand_on_die_ecc_status_4(chip, status,
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-19 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-19 7:46 [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: micron: Adapt the PAGE READ flow to constraint controllers Miquel Raynal
2020-05-19 8:39 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2020-05-19 12:17 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200519103919.50f4417e@collabora.com \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=nagasure@xilinx.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).