From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E7AC433E2 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:46:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEE4120658 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="LiBv+nTw"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="fGNG3Xu6" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AEE4120658 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=G6FYT5WoF7AwTlHnFz8L9dTY4gnGw4/xMp1x6kvNTFU=; b=LiBv+nTwdlk4+IbKXnKh32OxY 4g5vys5XAODpns7ZQpuYZ/sqoF9juB0qM2gelZyEx1OFVG6R+ko96Giwn4xCeg/EuCV0ZnNBSe/x/ zejCzyeyBsSFmwbdBKd3+yW/pWjiy6PkdZ4y0VxCFi63cqRG2LGGCi9uCtDqDFqJe3GKN0DA0QpDU PAO+gFN61/rOKGkqsGnLheIsTjhjGP5UR13lCvozFM6PCqF/h56WvKAIZ+IUkxJNYk3z3n1A/ff4p 4ZKrKTtT9KW1tz4I0j+42BgeKO0cqIRE8LXm0+Wa6YhMYSe0gwyFLbesCWM+rWgc5JilBMKohb7gZ PYtWRMFCA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kIWne-0006jJ-Oo; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:44:38 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kIWnX-0006g6-TG for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:44:34 +0000 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 08GCiPtk029007; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:44:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1600260265; bh=PHOXHbIfBUacKMzXaq9v2INusAFOOeC/jfdqrKTIwwE=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=fGNG3Xu6Ii6Y/BMDY0e8Dp+9AWQQftCdtncWvZOdcewcEmrvut6SvdXk/mSJnrt5/ kj2dtnVyNZJIjn2lfqOAXCI6CxQYg/QNns5h6iWtAnofRrEAlHrrhVw0sJGyPzEq0h 4mSUqeQPAgCzrN2JaMd0WfDiN5ImJtJKFhr+uRrk= Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (dfle114.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.35]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08GCiPuv101516 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:44:25 -0500 Received: from DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:44:25 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:44:25 -0500 Received: from pratyush-OptiPlex-790.dhcp.ti.com (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 08GCiIpV125391; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:44:22 -0500 From: Pratyush Yadav To: Tudor Ambarus , Miquel Raynal , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , , Subject: [PATCH v13 01/15] mtd: spi-nor: core: use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:14:04 +0530 Message-ID: <20200916124418.833-2-p.yadav@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20200916124418.833-1-p.yadav@ti.com> References: <20200916124418.833-1-p.yadav@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200916_084432_060615_B3507CCC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.13 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Boris Brezillon , Sekhar Nori , Pratyush Yadav Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code. Using EOPNOTSUPP is preferred in its stead. Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav --- drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c index 65eff4ce6ab1..623384ef9a5d 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c @@ -2297,7 +2297,7 @@ static int spi_nor_hwcaps_pp2cmd(u32 hwcaps) *@nor: pointer to a 'struct spi_nor' *@op: pointer to op template to be checked * - * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -ENOTSUPP otherwise. + * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -EOPNOTSUPP otherwise. */ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_op(struct spi_nor *nor, struct spi_mem_op *op) @@ -2311,12 +2311,12 @@ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_op(struct spi_nor *nor, op->addr.nbytes = 4; if (!spi_mem_supports_op(nor->spimem, op)) { if (nor->mtd.size > SZ_16M) - return -ENOTSUPP; + return -EOPNOTSUPP; /* If flash size <= 16MB, 3 address bytes are sufficient */ op->addr.nbytes = 3; if (!spi_mem_supports_op(nor->spimem, op)) - return -ENOTSUPP; + return -EOPNOTSUPP; } return 0; @@ -2328,7 +2328,7 @@ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_op(struct spi_nor *nor, *@nor: pointer to a 'struct spi_nor' *@read: pointer to op template to be checked * - * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -ENOTSUPP otherwise. + * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -EOPNOTSUPP otherwise. */ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_readop(struct spi_nor *nor, const struct spi_nor_read_command *read) @@ -2354,7 +2354,7 @@ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_readop(struct spi_nor *nor, *@nor: pointer to a 'struct spi_nor' *@pp: pointer to op template to be checked * - * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -ENOTSUPP otherwise. + * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -EOPNOTSUPP otherwise. */ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_pp(struct spi_nor *nor, const struct spi_nor_pp_command *pp) -- 2.28.0 ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/