From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13B6C2D0A8 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 798BB207E8 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="O9Hgn3bD" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 798BB207E8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=OSSMmRmkZ9lAivEA1CcPex5GiCymPhaGBGoVpyQp/f4=; b=O9Hgn3bDOIS+no5zdKooNzUkX TDjCy4cPMG+z7OV2VitMYQUNY/oHRBsr8qSz8qE6D6wx1ExnaAnIlssATiMbRRZ2GkCRZq9qPiUbb 83R6GLxoj0FSIRTEdKb5r8wVjocyO9Ay0JhJH8YXhEiGxNqDfxdFbRQojrK1IuheEsHBAa5seFmby epny9C8EAxBf837WfMgGmh5LPqJJ8W8Ph75SjS0QQMO88sqAmk2RCe/kO7d/4jpPuV3p9XT6CGdar X66Elm9hhxo+KeuOPHwA9JTyzLQ+iJ62XJPdZFdxBvC3fzBx8+LxqQxfvyoJ46K2mn5QAJa/Hj6wN V7GEmh27g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kMvd0-000353-DZ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:03:50 +0000 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e3e3]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kMvcy-000349-Lv for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:03:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:2c:6930:5cf4:84a1:2763:fe0d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bbrezillon) by bhuna.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C3B5297FEC; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 17:03:47 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 18:03:43 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Miquel Raynal Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mtd: spinand: micron: Generalize the function and structure names Message-ID: <20200928180343.4c5302a5@collabora.com> In-Reply-To: <20200928175005.48783b61@xps13> References: <20200913161533.10655-1-nthirumalesha7@gmail.com> <20200913161533.10655-2-nthirumalesha7@gmail.com> <20200915101321.1afa5033@xps13> <20200928165528.54e5db6e@xps13> <20200928174505.75fda272@collabora.com> <20200928175005.48783b61@xps13> Organization: Collabora X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.6 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200928_120348_807397_B14AF78C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.77 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra , Thirumalesha N , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Richard Weinberger , Chuanhong Guo , Shivamurthy Shastri Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 17:50:05 +0200 Miquel Raynal wrote: > > > The way OOB > > > bytes are organized do not seem relevant to me, I think i prefer the > > > "_4_/_8_" naming,even if it's not very explicit. > > > > The ECC strength doesn't say anything about the scheme used for ECC > > bytes placement, and you might end up with 2 different schemes > > providing the same strength, or the same scheme used for 2 different > > strengths. > > So perhaps both should be present in the name? No, the point was to re-use the same functions for various strengths if they use the same ECC placement scheme. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/