From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, vigneshr@ti.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, richard@nod.at
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: intel: remove broken code
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 09:48:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210104094849.1850c993@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201217221148.2877318-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Hi Martin,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> wrote on Thu,
17 Dec 2020 23:11:48 +0100:
> Drop the check for mtd->name as it's executed while the mtd variable is
> always NULL. If some MTD name is needed then it should be validated by
> the MTD core.
>
> While here, also drop the NULL assignment to the mtd variable as it's
> overwritten later on anyways and the NULL value is never read.
>
> Fixes: 0b1039f016e8a3 ("mtd: rawnand: Add NAND controller support on Intel LGM SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> ---
> I found this by looking at the new driver. This patch is compile-tested
> only.
>
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/intel-nand-controller.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/intel-nand-controller.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/intel-nand-controller.c
> index fdb112e8a90d..398de6ec68d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/intel-nand-controller.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/intel-nand-controller.c
> @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ static int ebu_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct ebu_nand_controller *ebu_host;
> struct nand_chip *nand;
> - struct mtd_info *mtd = NULL;
> + struct mtd_info *mtd;
> struct resource *res;
> char *resname;
> int ret;
> @@ -647,10 +647,6 @@ static int ebu_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ebu_host->ebu + EBU_ADDR_SEL(cs));
>
> nand_set_flash_node(&ebu_host->chip, dev->of_node);
> - if (!mtd->name) {
> - dev_err(ebu_host->dev, "NAND label property is mandatory\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
This is valid code, it's best to use a label = "my-storage"; property
in your NAND DT node. Then mtd->name will be updated by
nand_set_flash_node().
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-04 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-17 22:11 [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: intel: remove broken code Martin Blumenstingl
2021-01-04 8:48 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2021-01-04 13:13 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-01-04 13:19 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210104094849.1850c993@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox