From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
ladis@triops.cz, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: rawnand: omap: Use ECC information from the generic structures
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:36:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210120113614.6c5cb1e4@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210120101750.1163-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:17:50 +0100
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> The OMAP driver may leverage software BCH logic to locate errors while
> using its own hardware to detect the presence of errors. This is
> achieved with a "mixed" mode which initializes manually the software
> BCH internal logic while providing its own OOB layout.
>
> The issue here comes from the fact that the BCH driver has been
> updated to only use generic NAND objects, and no longer depend on raw
> NAND structures as it is usable from SPI-NAND as well. However, at the
> end of the BCH context initialization, the driver checks the validity
> of the OOB layout. At this stage, the raw NAND fields have not been
> populated yet while being used by the layout helpers, leading to an
> invalid layout.
>
> The solution here is to use the fields from the generic ECC structures
> which have already been updated and will always be valid instead of
> the raw NAND ones.
>
> Note: I don't know which commit exactly triggered the error, but the
> entire migration to a generic BCH driver got merged in one go, so this
> should not be a problem for stable backports.
>
> Reported-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
> Fixes: 80fe603160a4 ("mtd: nand: ecc-bch: Stop using raw NAND structures")
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c
> index fbb9955f2467..fd09b2a30abb 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c
> @@ -1866,18 +1866,20 @@ static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops omap_ooblayout_ops = {
> static int omap_sw_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
> struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
> {
> - struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> + struct nand_device *nand = mtd_to_nanddev(mtd);
> + unsigned int nsteps = nanddev_get_ecc_nsteps(nand);
> + unsigned int ecc_bytes = nand->ecc.ctx.total / nsteps;
I'd recommend adding a helper for that one too
(nanddev_ecc_bytes_per_step()?).
This being said, I think you're better off applying v1 (which is
self-contained) and keeping this refactor for the next release.
> int off = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
>
> - if (section >= chip->ecc.steps)
> + if (section >= nsteps)
> return -ERANGE;
>
> /*
> * When SW correction is employed, one OMAP specific marker byte is
> * reserved after each ECC step.
> */
> - oobregion->offset = off + (section * (chip->ecc.bytes + 1));
> - oobregion->length = chip->ecc.bytes;
> + oobregion->offset = off + (section * (ecc_bytes + 1));
> + oobregion->length = ecc_bytes;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1885,7 +1887,9 @@ static int omap_sw_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
> static int omap_sw_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
> struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
> {
> - struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> + struct nand_device *nand = mtd_to_nanddev(mtd);
> + unsigned int nsteps = nanddev_get_ecc_nsteps(nand);
> + unsigned int ecc_bytes = nand->ecc.ctx.total / nsteps;
> int off = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
>
> if (section)
> @@ -1895,7 +1899,7 @@ static int omap_sw_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
> * When SW correction is employed, one OMAP specific marker byte is
> * reserved after each ECC step.
> */
> - off += ((chip->ecc.bytes + 1) * chip->ecc.steps);
> + off += ((ecc_bytes + 1) * nsteps);
> if (off >= mtd->oobsize)
> return -ERANGE;
>
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-20 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-20 10:17 [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix OMAP2 ECC/OOB layout logic Miquel Raynal
2021-01-20 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: nand: Add a helper to retrieve the number of ECC steps Miquel Raynal
2021-01-20 10:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-01-20 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: rawnand: omap: Use ECC information from the generic structures Miquel Raynal
2021-01-20 10:36 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210120113614.6c5cb1e4@collabora.com \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=aford173@gmail.com \
--cc=ladis@triops.cz \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).