From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: intel-spi: Add support for second flash chip
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 13:28:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210526102810.GB291593@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e82f44552d0d4284fc5ed22ee0bee85a@walle.cc>
Hi,
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:31:58AM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> > Oh, I see now this commit:
> >
> > a314f6367787 ("mtd: spi-nor: Convert cadence-quadspi to use spi-mem
> > framework")
> >
> > So "SPI MEM" means generic SPI subsystem for memory mapped devices.
> > Unfortunately Intel controller at least is not capable of running
> > generic SPI transactions. It only supports accessing SPI-NOR flashes and
> > for those there is small set of commands that supports. I don't think it
> > is even possible to convert the driver to generic SPI subsystem.
>
> AFAIK it stands for SPI memory device (memory mapped is not a requirement).
> Eg. spi-nxp-fspi doesn't support generic SPI devices either, but just SPI
> flashes. So I'd guess SPI MEM is exactly what you are looking for.
OK, I see that there is ->mem_ops that can be used to implement
different higher level commands. What I'm not seeing is that how the
child SPI flash is created using this scheme? DeviceTree and ACPI are
supported fine but what about scanning? I mean the intel_spi driver has
this:
spi_nor_scan(&ispi->nor, NULL, &hwcaps);
But if the driver is to be moved under drivers/spi/* you can't really
call these functions anymore or can you? Or the point is to keep the
driver under controllers/ and just call spi_nor_scan(), and in addition
implement the new mem_ops?
Thanks in advance and sorry about many questions but there does not seem
to be a conversion guide nor any (non-DT/ACPI) examples that I can take
a look. :-)
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-26 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-25 16:03 [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: intel-spi: Add support for second flash chip Mika Westerberg
2021-05-25 19:14 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-05-26 9:12 ` Mika Westerberg
2021-05-26 9:24 ` Mika Westerberg
2021-05-26 9:31 ` Michael Walle
2021-05-26 10:28 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2021-05-31 11:27 ` Mika Westerberg
2021-06-03 11:07 ` Mika Westerberg
2021-06-03 18:08 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-06-04 11:28 ` Mika Westerberg
2021-06-04 11:53 ` Mark Brown
2021-06-04 14:10 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210526102810.GB291593@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=p.yadav@ti.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox