From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] mtd: rawnand: ensure return variable is initialized
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 09:10:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210608061018.GY1955@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210607085711.65c64c58@xps13>
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 08:57:11AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>
> In the ONFI specification, the sdr_timing_mode field is defined as
> follow:
>
> SDR timing mode support
> BIT VALUE MEANING
> 6-15 N/A Reserved (0)
> 5 1 supports timing mode 5
> 4 1 supports timing mode 4
> 3 1 supports timing mode 3
> 2 1 supports timing mode 2
> 1 1 supports timing mode 1
> 0 1 supports timing mode 0, shall be 1
>
> IOW sdr_timing_modes *cannot* be 0, or it is a truly deep and crazily
> impacting hardware bug (so far I am not aware of any chip not returning
> the right timing mode 0 value). Hence my proposal to turn best_mode as
> unsigned. I honestly don't know what is the best option here and am
> fully open to other suggestions to silence the robot.
If the hardware is broken we should just return -EINVAL.
regards,
dan carpenter
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-08 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-27 14:50 [PATCH][next] mtd: rawnand: ensure return variable is initialized Colin King
2021-05-27 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-05-27 15:22 ` Colin Ian King
2021-06-01 12:14 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-06-01 12:58 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-06-07 6:57 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-06-08 6:10 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210608061018.GY1955@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox