From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8161FC433EF for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:53:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B40D60F36 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:53:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 2B40D60F36 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc :To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=C3I7/a1Qk4W5onelErNEeO9CvmAdtSiiHrJ+2jTFOts=; b=NGf93V25g9XJ+N A/Ry4aNeI7vTODbLhFQfi1S7HUzpIt706raBXd7v4Iy46n3b5pLLeQ+Dr8/W0+JIt6NGLA0n41pQ1 z9FKsRAUQJcRNWEFc/nX02h5uN9I9jFQfq19Q8K5JRtolw/z2ShFFWGCiqPGolvxNu6pPh2zctgt9 deGg4ZrTULjhh0KxKzBftenWsbOcPaXQPmrnrVOQ8CUkGPqMpBh05HfKtMoBDU1wD8kM8cM/VLeQ0 0AbMEOCiDrRGXj48W5dl9uBmmL4s4+UqWKtXYQQTHl4lpSJicU+8k337puwu0hB5huvn5plnXHe0H ZG41rUf58VDtbpUBWepw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mb25g-003VXz-BO; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:52:16 +0000 Received: from [2001:4bb8:199:73c5:b1be:a02d:b459:cc1a] (helo=localhost) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mb25c-003VW1-IU; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:52:12 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: joern@lazybastard.org, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: RFC: decouple block2mtd from block layer internals Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 16:52:05 +0200 Message-Id: <20211014145206.1488967-1-hch@lst.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi all, while looking for abuses of ->bd_inode, block2mtd scored high on the list. This completely UNTESTED patch tries to move it off that and use the proper file abstraction instead. Are there any current users of this code that could give it a spin? ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/